Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-53959

Access Control in Jetbrains Youtrack ≤ 2024.3.85077

Published
15 July 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.6
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0026 18th percentile
Risk Priority 55 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-53959 is a high-severity Missing Authorization (CWE-862) vulnerability in Jetbrains Youtrack. Its CVSS base score is 7.6 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 18th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-6 (Least Privilege) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

In JetBrains YouTrack before 2025.2.86069, 2024.3.85077, 2025.1.86199 email spoofing via an administrative API was possible

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-38504Same product: Jetbrains Youtrack
CVE-2024-38506Same product: Jetbrains Youtrack
CVE-2024-28230Same product: Jetbrains Youtrack
CVE-2024-48902Same product: Jetbrains Youtrack
CVE-2024-54155Same product: Jetbrains Youtrack
CVE-2024-54153Same product: Jetbrains Youtrack
CVE-2024-56349Same vendor: Jetbrains
CVE-2024-50573Same vendor: Jetbrains
CVE-2025-24461Same vendor: Jetbrains
CVE-2025-52878Same vendor: Jetbrains

Affected Assets

jetbrains
youtrack
≤ 2024.3.85077 · 2025.1.62455 — 2025.1.86199

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • AC-3 Access Enforcement
  • AC-6 Least Privilege
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)
  • AU-12 Audit Record Generation
Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 5 hardening rules · 3 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly enforces authorization checks on the administrative API so that only permitted users can invoke email-related functions, blocking the spoofing path described in CVE-2025-53959.

prevent

Restricts which accounts are granted the elevated privileges needed to reach the vulnerable administrative API endpoints, reducing the population that could exploit the missing authorization.

detect

Requires logging of administrative API invocations so that unauthorized or anomalous email-spoofing attempts can be identified after the fact.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 full match
prevents

Explicitly requires defining, enforcing, and reviewing authorizations and least privilege, directly preventing missing authorization checks.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Requiring authentication and credentials before any access occurs eliminates the absence of authorization checks that would otherwise allow an unauthenticated actor to reach protected resources.

prevents

Requiring formal authorization of every access request before rights are granted ensures that checks for required permissions are performed, preventing missing authorization checks from being introduced.

prevents

Mandatory authorization checks and central records of granted rights ensure that every access attempt is preceded by an explicit decision rather than relying on missing checks.

mitigates

Segregating the approval of access rights from their implementation provides an independent check that reduces the impact of missing authorization checks in the resulting system configuration.

detects

By requiring competent outsiders to verify that every function enforces the need-to-know principle, the control lowers the likelihood that missing authorization checks persist undetected.

prevents

Defining authorization responsibilities and reviewing risk-treatment progress throughout the project lifecycle catches missing authorization checks before the system is deployed.

References