Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-55602

Memory Safety in Dlink Dir-619L Firmware 2.06b01

Public PoCMemory Safety
Published
22 August 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0051 41th percentile
Risk Priority 58 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-55602 is a high-severity Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) vulnerability in Dlink Dir-619L Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 41th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-55602 is a buffer overflow vulnerability affecting the D-Link DIR-619L router on firmware version 2.06B01. The issue resides in the formSysCmd function and can be triggered via a specially crafted submit-url parameter. It is classified under CWE-787 (Out-of-bounds Write) and CWE-120 (Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input), with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H), indicating high availability impact potential without confidentiality or integrity effects.

An unauthenticated remote attacker with network access to the device can exploit this vulnerability with low attack complexity and no user interaction. By sending a malicious request to the vulnerable parameter, the attacker can trigger the buffer overflow, leading to denial-of-service conditions such as device crashes or reboots.

Mitigation guidance is available in vendor advisories, including the D-Link security bulletin at https://www.dlink.com/en/security-bulletin/. Additional technical details and analysis are provided in the referenced GitHub repository at https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/D-Link6/vuln_79/79.md.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

D-Link DIR-619L 2.06B01 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow in the formSysCmd function via the submit-url parameter.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1211 Exploitation for Stealth Stealth
Adversaries may exploit vulnerabilities to evade detection by hiding activity, suppressing logging, or operating within trusted or unmonitored components.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-55599Same product: Dlink Dir-619L
CVE-2025-55611Same product: Dlink Dir-619L
CVE-2023-37791Same product: Dlink Dir-619L
CVE-2023-43860Same product: Dlink Dir-619L
CVE-2023-43862Same product: Dlink Dir-619L
CVE-2023-43869Same product: Dlink Dir-619L
CVE-2023-43866Same product: Dlink Dir-619L
CVE-2023-43863Same product: Dlink Dir-619L
CVE-2023-43865Same product: Dlink Dir-619L
CVE-2023-43867Same product: Dlink Dir-619L

Affected Assets

dlink
dir-619l firmware
2.06b01

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.2.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation (including fuzzing and bounds checks) finds out-of-bounds write flaws before deployment.

Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.

Requiring documented secure-development standards and tools can mandate bounds-checked coding practices that avoid the weakness.

Engineering principles require bounds checking and safe buffer handling in design.

Memory-protection mechanisms limit the exploitability and blast radius of a successful out-of-bounds write.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure-development practices (static analysis, bounds checking, code review) are the primary means of preventing out-of-bounds writes.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover out-of-bounds write flaws so they can be remediated.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching or replacing vulnerable software directly eliminates known instances of this coding weakness.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance can detect and prevent out-of-bounds write defects.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates practices that prevent out-of-bounds writes.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify bounds-checking and safe memory handling.

prevents

Secure architecture and engineering principles reduce the likelihood of buffer overflows.

prevents

Change management can enforce review gates that catch unsafe memory operations before deployment.

References