Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-60465

Memory Safety in Gpac ≤ 26.02.0

Public PoCMemory Safety
Published
25 June 2026
Modified
30 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0017 7th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-60465 is a medium-severity Use After Free (CWE-416) vulnerability in Gpac Gpac. Its CVSS base score is 6.1 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Malicious File (T1204.002); ranked at the 7th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) and SI-16 (Memory Protection) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

No EU or UK CSIRT advisories indexed for this CVE.

Vulnerability Data

A use-after-free in the gf_filter_pid_inst_swap function (/filter_core/filter_pid.c) of GPAC Project/MP4Box before 26.02.0 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via supplying a crafted media file.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1204.002 Malicious File Execution
An adversary may rely upon a user opening a malicious file in order to gain execution.
Why these techniques?

Use-after-free triggered by crafted media file directly enables malicious file delivery for DoS impact.

Confidence: MEDIUM · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-60466Same product: Gpac Gpac
CVE-2025-60464Same product: Gpac Gpac
CVE-2025-60471Same product: Gpac Gpac
CVE-2024-6064Same product: Gpac Gpac
CVE-2023-4679Same product: Gpac Gpac
CVE-2023-39562Same product: Gpac Gpac
CVE-2023-41000Same product: Gpac Gpac
CVE-2023-4755Same product: Gpac Gpac
CVE-2025-55644Same product: Gpac Gpac
CVE-2023-0358Same product: Gpac Gpac

Affected Assets

gpac
gpac
≤ 26.02.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SI-10 Information Input Validation
  • SI-16 Memory Protection
  • SI-2 Flaw Remediation
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 3 hardening rules · 3 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.4.3

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Validates untrusted media file input before GPAC filter processing to block crafted streams that trigger the use-after-free.

prevent

Applies memory protections that directly mitigate use-after-free conditions in gf_filter_pid_inst_swap.

prevent

Requires prompt patching of GPAC to the fixed 26.02.0 release that eliminates the vulnerable filter_pid code path.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly incorporate memory-safety tooling and reviews that prevent most use-after-free defects.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes can discover use-after-free issues via scanning or analysis but do not prevent their introduction.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching removes known use-after-free instances after they have been introduced in released software.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing in development can detect use-after-free bugs before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates memory-safety practices that reduce use-after-free defects.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify memory-management rules that mitigate use-after-free.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include memory-safety design choices that limit use-after-free exposure.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly prescribe avoidance of use-after-free patterns.

prevents

Change-management processes help ensure memory-safety fixes are deployed consistently.

References