Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HSummary
CVE-2025-60468 is a medium-severity Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122) vulnerability in Gpac Gpac. Its CVSS base score is 5.5 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Malicious File (T1204.002); ranked at the 10th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) and SI-16 (Memory Protection) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-210332
Vulnerability Data
GPAC Multimedia Open Source Project GPAC Project/MP4Box 2.5-DEV-rev1593-gfe88c3545-master is affected by: Buffer Overflow. The impact is: cause a denial of service (local). The component is: filter_core/filter_pid.c (L:574-580): function gf_filter_pid_inst_swap_delete_task() improperly accesses freed objects during PID instance swap/delete cleanup, leading to…
more
heap use-after-free. The attack vector is: Local (AV:L): a local, authenticated user who processes a specially crafted MPEG-2 TS/MP4 file with MP4Box can trigger the bug during filter teardown (PID instance swap/delete), causing a crash. ¶¶ In GPAC s MP4Box, gf_filter_pid_inst_swap_delete_task() in filter_core/filter_pid.c may dereference objects after they have been freed when cleaning up PID instances after a swap/delete operation. Crafted inputs (e.g., malformed MPEG-2 TS) can trigger a heap use-after-free and crash; exploitation may be possible.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI
Why these techniques?
Local DoS via crafted media file processing directly maps to malicious file user execution and application exploitation for endpoint DoS.
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Directly requires validation of input data (MPEG-2 TS/MP4 files) to reject malformed content before it reaches the vulnerable PID swap/delete path.
Applies memory-protection mechanisms (e.g., guard pages, pointer sanitization) that block or contain the heap use-after-free dereference in gf_filter_pid_inst_swap_delete_task().
Enforces least-privilege execution so a local authenticated user cannot trigger MP4Box processing with privileges that would allow broader impact from the resulting crash.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices directly require bounds checking and safe memory handling that prevent heap overflows.
Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover heap-overflow flaws but does not prevent their introduction in code.
Timely patching removes known heap-overflow instances after they exist.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect heap overflows before release.
Secure development lifecycle mandates practices that reduce the likelihood of introducing heap overflows.
Application security requirements can specify bounds-checking and safe memory APIs that mitigate heap overflows.
Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safety and input-validation controls that address heap overflows.
Secure coding standards directly prescribe techniques (safe functions, bounds checks) that prevent heap-based buffer overflows.
Change management ensures controlled deployment of fixes for discovered heap-overflow vulnerabilities.