Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-0270

Path Traversal in Paloaltonetworks Cortex Xsoar 8.10.0 – 8.13.0.11

Published
10 June 2026
Modified
10 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 4.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:U/V:D/RE:M/U:Amber
EPSS Score 0.0020 10th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-0270 is a medium-severity Path Traversal (CWE-22) vulnerability in Paloaltonetworks Cortex Xsoar. Its CVSS base score is 4.8 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Ingress Tool Transfer (T1105); ranked at the 10th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-8 (Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity) and SC-7 (Boundary Protection) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A path traversal vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR engine software running on Linux allows an unauthenticated attacker on an adjacent network, with the ability to intercept and manipulate network response traffic via a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack, to write…

more

arbitrary files to the host.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1105 Ingress Tool Transfer Command And Control
Adversaries may transfer tools or other files from an external system into a compromised environment.
Why these techniques?

Path traversal enables arbitrary file write on host, directly facilitating ingress/transfer of tools or payloads via manipulated network responses.

Confidence: MEDIUM · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-52623Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2025-14728Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-47742Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2023-34865Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2025-12382Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2026-24209Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2026-24208Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-55913Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2025-54293Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2026-2749Same product: Linux Linux Kernel

Affected Assets

paloaltonetworks
cortex xsoar
8.10.0 — 8.13.0.11

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SC-8 Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
  • SC-7 Boundary Protection
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)
  • SI-7 Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity
Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.3.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Enforces cryptographic protection of network traffic, directly blocking the MITM interception and manipulation required to exploit the path traversal.

prevent

Boundary protection can restrict adjacent-network access and limit the attack surface for unauthenticated traffic reaching the Cortex XSOAR engine.

detect

Integrity verification of received data can detect unauthorized file-write attempts resulting from the path traversal.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching/maintenance can remediate known path-traversal flaws in deployed software (partial prevention of exploitability) but does nothing to stop the coding defect from being introduced in the first place.

PR.AA-05 none match
prevents

PR.AA-05 defines and reviews access policies but does not address code-level pathname neutralization, so neither direction prevents CWE-22.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing in development catches path traversal via static/dynamic analysis.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and path sanitization that directly prevent path traversal.

prevents

Application security requirements include rules for safe file handling and canonicalization.

prevents

Secure architecture principles require least-privilege file access and directory isolation.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe path construction and mandate safe APIs.

mitigates

Information access restriction limits which files an application may read or write.

References