Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-1145

Memory Safety in Quickjs-Ng Quickjs ≤ 0.11.0

Public PoCMemory Safety
Published
19 January 2026
Modified
23 February 2026
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v4 5.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0034 27th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-1145 is a medium-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability in Quickjs-Ng Quickjs. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 27th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-1145 is a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the js_typed_array_constructor_ta function within the quickjs.c file of quickjs-ng/quickjs versions up to 0.11.0. This flaw allows improper memory handling during typed array construction, potentially leading to memory corruption. The vulnerability was published on 2026-01-19 and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L), mapped to CWE-119 (Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) and CWE-122 (Heap-based Buffer Overflow).

The vulnerability can be exploited remotely by an unauthenticated attacker over the network with low complexity, requiring user interaction such as clicking a malicious link or processing crafted input in an application embedding QuickJS. Successful exploitation enables limited impacts, including partial disclosure of sensitive information, minor modification of data, or denial of service through application crashes, but does not allow full code execution or privilege escalation due to the scoped and low-impact scoring.

Mitigation is available via the patch commit 53aebe66170d545bb6265906fe4324e4477de8b4 in the quickjs-ng/quickjs repository. Security practitioners should update to a patched version of QuickJS, as advised in the associated GitHub issue #1305 and pull request #1306, to prevent exploitation.

An exploit for this vulnerability has been publicly disclosed, increasing the risk for unpatched deployments of QuickJS in embedded JavaScript engines.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A flaw has been found in quickjs-ng quickjs up to 0.11.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function js_typed_array_constructor_ta of the file quickjs.c. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit…

more

has been published and may be used. Patch name: 53aebe66170d545bb6265906fe4324e4477de8b4. It is suggested to install a patch to address this issue.

CWE(s)
CWE-119CWE-122

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
attack.mitre.org →
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
attack.mitre.org →
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
attack.mitre.org →
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
attack.mitre.org →
T1055 Process Injection Stealth
Adversaries may inject code into processes in order to evade process-based defenses as well as possibly elevate privileges.
attack.mitre.org →
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-0821Same product: Quickjs-Ng Quickjs
CVE-2026-0822Same product: Quickjs-Ng Quickjs
CVE-2026-1144Same product: Quickjs-Ng Quickjs
CVE-2024-13903Same product: Quickjs-Ng Quickjs
CVE-2026-15506Shared CWE-119, CWE-122
CVE-2025-7069Shared CWE-119, CWE-122
CVE-2025-11010Shared CWE-119, CWE-122
CVE-2025-6120Shared CWE-119, CWE-122
CVE-2026-5474Shared CWE-119, CWE-122
CVE-2026-9502Shared CWE-119, CWE-122

Affected Assets

quickjs-ng
quickjs
≤ 0.11.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V17.3.2
  • V1.4.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation good match

Developer testing and evaluation (including fuzzing and memory-error detectors) can discover heap overflows after they have been coded.

SI-10 Information Input Validation good match

Input validation enforces bounds checking on data written to heap buffers, directly stopping the overflow condition from being introduced.

SA-8 Security and Privacy Engineering Principles partial match

Secure engineering principles require memory-safe design and coding that structurally avoids buffer-boundary violations.

SI-16 Memory Protection partial match

Memory protection restricts exploitation impact of buffer overflows without eliminating the underlying coding flaw.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 full match
prevents

Secure-development practices directly require bounds checking and safe memory handling that prevent heap overflows.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability scanning and code analysis directly surface buffer-boundary flaws.

ID.RA-08 partial match
prevents

Receiving and triaging vulnerability disclosures commonly includes buffer-related reports.

PR.AT-02 partial match
prevents

Developer training on secure coding reduces introduction of memory-buffer errors.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching replaces vulnerable code containing buffer-boundary defects.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.

A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match
prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates memory-safety practices that directly prevent buffer-boundary violations.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
prevents

Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles partial match
prevents

Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safe design patterns that mitigate buffer overflows.

A.8.28 Secure coding partial match
prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe buffer operations, directly eliminating CWE-119.

A.8.32 Change management none match
none

Change management ensures controlled deployment of fixes for discovered heap-overflow vulnerabilities.

References