Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-11628

Memory Safety in Google Chrome ≤ 149.0.7827.103

Published
09 June 2026
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0018 8th percentile
Risk Priority 45 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-11628 is a medium-severity Use After Free (CWE-416) vulnerability in Google Chrome. Its CVSS base score is 6.8 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203); ranked at the 8th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-16 (Memory Protection) and SI-2 (Flaw Remediation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Use after free in Ozone in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.103 allowed a local attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via physical access to the device. (Chromium security severity: Critical)

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
Why these techniques?

Use-after-free in Chrome enables local code execution via client app exploitation (physical access vector).

Confidence: MEDIUM · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-9114Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-10888Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-10945Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-11177Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-10926Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-12012Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-10893Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-10906Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-11303Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-12462Same product: Apple Macos

Affected Assets

google
chrome
≤ 149.0.7827.103

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SI-2 Flaw Remediation
  • SI-16 Memory Protection
  • PE-3 Physical Access Control
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 3 hardening rules · 3 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.4.3

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly requires timely patching of Chrome to eliminate the reported use-after-free flaw before local exploitation can occur.

prevent

Implements memory protections that block unauthorized code execution arising from heap corruption caused by the use-after-free condition.

prevent

Enforces physical access restrictions that deny the local attacker the device access required to trigger the vulnerability.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly incorporate memory-safety tooling and reviews that prevent most use-after-free defects.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes can discover use-after-free issues via scanning or analysis but do not prevent their introduction.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching removes known use-after-free instances after they have been introduced in released software.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing in development can detect use-after-free bugs before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates memory-safety practices that reduce use-after-free defects.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify memory-management rules that mitigate use-after-free.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include memory-safety design choices that limit use-after-free exposure.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly prescribe avoidance of use-after-free patterns.

prevents

Change-management processes help ensure memory-safety fixes are deployed consistently.

References