Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HSummary
CVE-2026-14178 is a medium-severity Use After Free (CWE-416) vulnerability in Gitcode (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 5.9 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004); ranked at the 28th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-2 (Flaw Remediation) and AC-6 (Least Privilege) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-40326
Vulnerability Data
openGauss 在处理带 NLS 参数的 to_timestamp 调用时，to_timestamp_with_fmt_nls() 会将 nls_fmt_str 保存到 u_sess->parser_cxt.nls_fmt_str。在 seqscan + sort 执行路径下，该字符串原本被分配在 SeqScan 的表达式上下文中；当 SeqScan 完成后，该内存上下文会被 reset，但后续结果输出阶段 timestamp_out() 仍会通过 CheckNlsFormat() 访问 u_sess->parser_cxt.nls_fmt_str，导致访问已释放内存。攻击者在具备数据库 SQL 执行权限的情况下，可构造特定 to_timestamp(..., ..., nlsparam) 查询触发 heap-use-after-free。在 ASan/Memcheck 环境下表现为数据库服务退出；在实际运行环境中可能造成后端进程异常退出，影响数据库服务可用性，形成拒绝服务风险。该问题在openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC1版本和openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC2版本存在，目前已在openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC3版本修复。由于 openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC1版本和openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC2均为创新版本，不会发布针对性补丁包，涉及版本升级至 openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC3或更新版本即可。
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI
Why these techniques?
Use-after-free in openGauss triggered by crafted SQL (to_timestamp with NLS) directly enables application/system crash for DoS.
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Directly requires applying the vendor fix (upgrade to RC3) that eliminates the use-after-free in to_timestamp_with_fmt_nls / CheckNlsFormat.
Restricts which database users can execute arbitrary SQL containing the to_timestamp(..., nlsparam) call that triggers the heap-use-after-free.
Monitors for abnormal backend process termination or memory-fault events that result from the use-after-free on the seqscan+sort path.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly incorporate memory-safety tooling and reviews that prevent most use-after-free defects.
Vulnerability identification processes can discover use-after-free issues via scanning or analysis but do not prevent their introduction.
Routine patching removes known use-after-free instances after they have been introduced in released software.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development can detect use-after-free bugs before release.
Secure SDLC mandates memory-safety practices that reduce use-after-free defects.
Application security requirements can specify memory-management rules that mitigate use-after-free.
Secure architecture principles include memory-safety design choices that limit use-after-free exposure.
Secure coding standards directly prescribe avoidance of use-after-free patterns.
Change-management processes help ensure memory-safety fixes are deployed consistently.