Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-1547

Command Injection in Totolink A7000R Firmware 4.1cu.4154

Published
28 January 2026
Modified
09 February 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 5.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.028 85th percentile
Risk Priority 39 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-1547 is a medium-severity Injection (CWE-74) vulnerability in Totolink A7000R Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 15% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-1547 is a command injection vulnerability in the Totolink A7000R router running firmware version 4.1cu.4154. It affects the setUnloadUserData function within the /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi script, where the plugin_name argument is improperly handled, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary commands. The issue aligns with CWE-74 (improper neutralization of special elements) and CWE-77 (command injection), earning a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L).

Attackers with low privileges, such as authenticated users, can exploit this remotely over the network with low complexity and no user interaction required. Successful exploitation enables limited command execution on the device, potentially leading to low-impact confidentiality, integrity, and availability compromises, such as data leakage, minor configuration changes, or service disruptions.

Public proof-of-concept exploits are available on GitHub at repositories detailing the RCE via setUnloadUserData, including specific PoC instructions. VulDB advisories (ctiid.343231, id.343231, submit.739713) document the vulnerability, but no vendor patches or specific mitigation steps are detailed in the provided references. Security practitioners should isolate affected devices and monitor for anomalous CGI requests until firmware updates are confirmed.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability was detected in Totolink A7000R 4.1cu.4154. This affects the function setUnloadUserData of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. The manipulation of the argument plugin_name results in command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is now public…

more

and may be used.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1221 Template Injection Stealth
Adversaries may create or modify references in user document templates to conceal malicious code or force authentication attempts.
T1659 Content Injection Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic.
T1674 Input Injection Execution
Adversaries may simulate keystrokes on a victim’s computer by various means to perform any type of action on behalf of the user, such as launching the command interpreter using keyboard shortcuts, typing an inline script to be executed,…
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-1548Same product: Totolink A7000R
CVE-2026-1601Same product: Totolink A7000R
CVE-2026-1623Same product: Totolink A7000R
CVE-2026-1326Same vendor: Totolink
CVE-2025-3987Same vendor: Totolink
CVE-2025-5504Same vendor: Totolink
CVE-2025-7615Same vendor: Totolink
CVE-2025-4849Same vendor: Totolink
CVE-2026-5020Same vendor: Totolink
CVE-2026-5105Same vendor: Totolink

Affected Assets

totolink
a7000r firmware
4.1cu.4154

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.1
  • V1.2.3
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.

SI-10 directly requires validation of information inputs to reject malformed or special-element content before it reaches downstream parsers.

Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and output encoding that prevent injection flaws.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

finds

Security testing in development catches injection vulnerabilities before release.

A.8.15 Logging partial match
finds

Logging supports detection of injection attempts but does not prevent the weakness.

finds

Monitoring activities can identify active injection attacks after they occur.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevent injection flaws.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection attacks in software design.

References