Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2026-1601 is a medium-severity Injection (CWE-74) vulnerability in Totolink A7000R Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 22% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-1601 is a command injection vulnerability affecting the Totolink A7000R router running firmware version 4.1cu.4154. The flaw resides in the setUploadUserData function within the /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi CGI script, where manipulation of the FileName argument fails to properly neutralize special elements, enabling arbitrary command execution. This issue aligns with CWE-74 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements) and CWE-77 (Command Injection), earning a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L).
The vulnerability can be exploited remotely by an authenticated attacker with low privileges, such as a standard user account on the device. Successful exploitation allows injection and execution of operating system commands, potentially resulting in limited impacts to confidentiality, integrity, and availability, including unauthorized data access, modification of system files, or denial-of-service conditions.
Public proof-of-concept exploits are available on GitHub, detailing the remote code execution (RCE) via the setUploadUserData endpoint. VulDB advisories (ctiid.343373, id.343373) document the issue, but no vendor patches or specific mitigation steps are detailed in the referenced sources. Security practitioners should isolate affected devices and monitor for anomalous CGI requests.
The exploit code has been publicly disclosed and could be adapted for real-world attacks against unpatched Totolink A7000R routers. The vulnerability was published on 2026-01-29.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-4972
Vulnerability Data
A weakness has been identified in Totolink A7000R 4.1cu.4154. The impacted element is the function setUploadUserData of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Executing a manipulation of the argument FileName can lead to command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit…
more
has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.1V1.2.3V1.2.5V1.2.8
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.
SI-10 directly requires validation of information inputs to reject malformed or special-element content before it reaches downstream parsers.
Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and output encoding that prevent injection flaws.
Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.
Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.
Security testing in development catches injection vulnerabilities before release.
Logging supports detection of injection attempts but does not prevent the weakness.
Monitoring activities can identify active injection attacks after they occur.
Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevent injection flaws.
Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection attacks in software design.