Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HSummary
CVE-2026-1584 is a high-severity NULL Pointer Dereference (CWE-476) vulnerability in Gnu Gnutls. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499); ranked in the top 32% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-1584 is a vulnerability in the GnuTLS cryptographic library, stemming from a NULL pointer dereference triggered by a specially crafted ClientHello message containing an invalid Pre-Shared Key (PSK) binder value during the TLS handshake. This flaw affects GnuTLS implementations, particularly servers using the library for TLS termination, and was published on 2026-04-09. It is classified under CWE-476 (NULL Pointer Dereference) with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending the malformed ClientHello over the network, requiring low complexity and no user interaction or privileges. Successful exploitation causes the server to crash, resulting in a denial-of-service (DoS) condition with high availability impact but no confidentiality or integrity effects.
Red Hat has issued a security advisory detailing the issue at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-1584, along with a Bugzilla tracking entry at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2435258, where practitioners can find information on affected versions, patches, and mitigation steps.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-20986
Vulnerability Data
A flaw was found in gnutls. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted ClientHello message with an invalid Pre-Shared Key (PSK) binder value during the TLS handshake. This can lead to a NULL pointer…
more
dereference, causing the server to crash and resulting in a remote Denial of Service (DoS) condition.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation (including static analysis) directly finds null-dereference bugs before deployment.
Documented development standards and tools can enforce null-safety rules and safe pointer usage.
Engineering principles can mandate defensive coding such as explicit null checks before dereference.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices (static analysis, code review, safe coding standards) directly prevent NULL dereference bugs during development.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect NULL dereference defects before release.
Secure SDLC mandates defensive coding practices that can prevent NULL dereferences.
Application security requirements can specify input validation and pointer-safety rules.
Secure architecture principles encourage defensive design that avoids unsafe pointer use.
Secure coding standards directly require NULL-pointer checks and safe dereference patterns.