CVE-2026-1619
Access Control in Uni-Yaz Flexcity 1.0 – 1.0.36
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:LSummary
CVE-2026-1619 is a high-severity Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) vulnerability in Uni-Yaz Flexcity. Its CVSS base score is 8.3 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 22th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-24 (Access Control Decisions) and AC-3 (Access Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-1619 is an Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability (CWE-639) in Universal Software Inc.'s FlexCity/Kiosk software. It enables exploitation of trusted identifiers through user-controlled keys. The issue affects FlexCity/Kiosk versions from 1.0 up to but not including 1.0.36.
Attackers with low privileges (PR:L) can exploit this vulnerability remotely over the network (AV:N) with low attack complexity (AC:L) and no user interaction (UI:N). Successful exploitation results in high confidentiality (C:H) and integrity (I:H) impacts, with low availability impact (A:L), yielding a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.3 in an unchanged scope (S:U).
The USOM advisory at https://www.usom.gov.tr/bildirim/tr-26-0065 provides details on the vulnerability, with mitigation achieved by updating to FlexCity/Kiosk version 1.0.36 or later.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-7380
Vulnerability Data
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Universal Software Inc. FlexCity/Kiosk allows Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers. This issue affects FlexCity/Kiosk: from 1.0 before 1.0.36.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Enforcing approved authorizations on every access request structurally stops a user-controlled key from reaching another user's data.
Requiring explicit access-control decisions on each request blocks unauthorized key-driven access.
Least-privilege restrictions limit the scope of data reachable even if a key check is bypassed.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Enforcing authorization policy and least privilege directly blocks user-controlled key tampering that bypasses access checks.
Logical access controls prevent unauthorized data access that results from missing authorization checks on object references.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect missing authorization checks but does not prevent the weakness in production.
Information access restriction explicitly enforces that users may only retrieve data they are authorized to see, directly addressing user-controlled key bypass.
Access control policy directly requires enforcement of authorization rules that prevent unauthorized access via manipulated keys.
Managing access rights includes ensuring users can only access their own records and not bypass authorization by altering identifiers.
Privileged access rights control restricts what data each user may access, mitigating direct object reference attacks.
Secure development lifecycle includes authorization design but does not itself implement runtime access checks.