CVE-2026-2006
Postgresql 14.0 – 14.21
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2026-2006 is a high-severity Improper Validation of Array Index (CWE-129) vulnerability in Postgresql Postgresql. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 38% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-2006 is a vulnerability in PostgreSQL's text manipulation functions stemming from missing validation of multibyte character length, which enables a buffer overrun (CWE-129). It affects versions prior to PostgreSQL 18.2, 17.8, 16.12, 15.16, and 14.21. The issue was published on 2026-02-12 and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
A database user with low privileges (PR:L) can exploit this vulnerability remotely over the network (AV:N) with low attack complexity (AC:L) and without requiring user interaction (UI:N). By issuing crafted queries, the attacker triggers the buffer overrun, achieving arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the operating system user running the PostgreSQL database process.
The official PostgreSQL security advisory at https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2026-2006/ details mitigation steps, which include upgrading to one of the fixed versions: 18.2, 17.8, 16.12, 15.16, or 14.21.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-6186
Vulnerability Data
Missing validation of multibyte character length in PostgreSQL text manipulation allows a database user to issue crafted queries that achieve a buffer overrun. That suffices to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database. Versions before PostgreSQL…
more
18.2, 17.8, 16.12, 15.16, and 14.21 are affected.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.4.2V2.1.1V2.2.1V2.2.2
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Requires explicit validation of supplied indices/offsets/positions before they are used to access buffers or other indexable resources.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and bounds checking that prevent improper array indexing.
Vulnerability identification processes can discover missing index validation via scanning or reviews.
Patching and replacement can remediate instances of the weakness after discovery.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development can detect out-of-bounds array access but does not prevent the weakness by itself.
Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and bounds checking that directly prevents improper array indexing.
Application security requirements include validation of untrusted input used for indexing or addressing memory structures.
Secure architecture principles encourage defensive coding patterns that reduce index-related vulnerabilities.
Secure coding standards explicitly require bounds checking and validation of array indices derived from untrusted data.