Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-21426

LPE in Dell Powerscale Onefs ≤ 9.10.1.6

Published
04 March 2026
Modified
04 March 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0013 3th percentile
Risk Priority 45 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-21426 is a medium-severity Execution with Unnecessary Privileges (CWE-250) vulnerability in Dell Powerscale Onefs. Its CVSS base score is 6.7 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 3th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-6 (Least Privilege) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions prior to 9.10.1.6 and versions 9.11.0.0 through 9.12.0.1, contains an execution with unnecessary privileges vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service, elevation of privileges, and…

more

information disclosure.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
Why these techniques?

CWE-250 unnecessary privileges directly enables local privilege escalation (T1068) by a high-privileged local attacker.

Confidence: HIGH · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-21424Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2026-21421Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2026-49501Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2024-32853Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2023-32486Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2026-21425Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2024-25967Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2026-27102Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2025-22471Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2024-22449Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs

Affected Assets

dell
powerscale onefs
≤ 9.10.1.6 · 9.11.0.0 — 9.13.0.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • AC-6 Least Privilege
  • AC-3 Access Enforcement
  • CM-7 Least Functionality
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 6 hardening rules · 6 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V10.2.3
  • V13.2.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly counters CWE-250 by requiring processes and users to operate with only the privileges needed, preventing the unnecessary high-privilege execution that enables the described local escalation/DoS/info disclosure.

prevent

Enforces access control policies at the point of execution so that even a high-privileged local account cannot abuse excess rights granted by the vulnerable OneFS components.

prevent

Limits the system to only essential capabilities and services, reducing the attack surface created by unnecessary privileged functionality in OneFS versions prior to the fix.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 mostly match
prevents

PR.AA-05 directly enforces least privilege so largely eliminates CWE-250 at design time, yet the weakness can still arise from runtime escalation paths, third-party code, or misapplied role definitions outside this single control.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Requiring explicit justification and time-limited grants discourages the routine allocation of unnecessary privileges that would otherwise allow execution with more rights than required.

prevents

Restricting privileged utilities to the fewest trusted users and requiring explicit authorization directly stops developers or operators from embedding or invoking code that runs with unnecessary elevated rights.

prevents

Mandating separate non-privileged identities for routine work and restricting privileged accounts to administrative tasks reduces the chance that everyday operations run with unnecessary elevated rights.

prevents

The control explicitly calls for minimizing privileged identities and disabling unnecessary accounts, thereby reducing the number of processes that run with unnecessary privileges.

prevents

The requirement to restrict privileged access and apply segregation of duties limits the number of processes or accounts that must run with elevated rights, lowering the impact of unnecessary privilege assignments.

mitigates

Forcing distinct roles for initiating versus executing changes reduces the chance that an individual will run with unnecessary privileges to perform both steps.

References