Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-22688

RCE in Tencent Weknora ≤ 0.2.5

Published
10 January 2026
Modified
22 January 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 9.9
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.018 77th percentile
Risk Priority 72 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-22688 is a critical-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Tencent Weknora. Its CVSS base score is 9.9 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 23% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

This vulnerability is AI-related — categorised as AI Agent Protocols and Integrations; in the Protocol-Specific Risks risk domain.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-22688 is a command injection vulnerability (CWE-77) affecting WeKnora, an LLM-powered framework for deep document understanding and semantic retrieval. In versions prior to 0.2.5, the vulnerability enables authenticated users to inject malicious values into the stdio_config.command/args fields within MCP stdio settings. This injection causes the server to execute arbitrary subprocesses using the attacker-supplied values. The issue carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.9 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating critical severity due to its potential for complete system compromise.

An attacker with authenticated access to the WeKnora server can exploit this vulnerability remotely over the network with low complexity and no user interaction required. By manipulating the stdio_config parameters, the attacker can execute arbitrary commands as the server process, achieving high-impact confidentiality, integrity, and availability violations. The changed scope (S:C) amplifies the risk, as successful exploitation allows control over subprocesses that could lead to full server takeover, data exfiltration, or further lateral movement.

The vulnerability has been addressed in WeKnora version 0.2.5, as detailed in the project's GitHub security advisory (GHSA-78h3-63c4-5fqc) and corresponding patch commit (f7900a5e9a18c99d25cec9589ead9e4e59ce04bb). Security practitioners should prioritize upgrading to the patched version and review access controls for authenticated users interacting with MCP stdio configurations.

As an LLM-powered framework, this vulnerability highlights risks in AI/ML pipelines where untrusted inputs can propagate to system-level execution, though no evidence of real-world exploitation is reported in available sources.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

WeKnora is an LLM-powered framework designed for deep document understanding and semantic retrieval. Prior to version 0.2.5, there is a command injection vulnerability that allows authenticated users to inject stdio_config.command/args into MCP stdio settings, causing the server to execute subprocesses…

more

using these injected values. This issue has been patched in version 0.2.5.

CWE(s)

AI Security AnalysisAI

AI Category
AI Agent Protocols and Integrations
Risk Domain
Protocol-Specific Risks
OWASP Top 10 for LLMs 2025
None mapped
Classification Reason
Matched keywords: llm, mcp

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.008 Network Device CLI Execution
Adversaries may abuse scripting or built-in command line interpreters (CLI) on network devices to execute malicious command and payloads.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-30861Same product: Tencent Weknora
CVE-2026-30856Same product: Tencent Weknora
CVE-2026-8786Same product: Tencent Weknora
CVE-2026-30858Same product: Tencent Weknora
CVE-2025-11046Same product: Tencent Weknora
CVE-2026-30860Same product: Tencent Weknora
CVE-2026-30857Same product: Tencent Weknora
CVE-2026-22687Same product: Tencent Weknora
CVE-2026-30247Same product: Tencent Weknora
CVE-2026-30855Same product: Tencent Weknora

Affected Assets

tencent
weknora
≤ 0.2.5

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.3
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V1.2.9

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.

Input validation directly stops construction of commands from untrusted data containing special elements.

Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and neutralization that prevent command injection.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

finds

Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent command injection.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.

prevents

Secure architecture principles reduce the attack surface but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques needed.

References