Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2026-25575 is a high-severity Relative Path Traversal (CWE-23) vulnerability in Tum Navigatum. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 37th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-25575 is a path traversal vulnerability affecting NavigaTUM, an open-source website and API used for searching rooms, buildings, and other places at the Technical University of Munich. The flaw exists in the propose_edits endpoint prior to commit 86f34c7, where unsanitized file keys in JSON payloads allow attackers to include traversal sequences such as ../../, enabling escape from the intended temporary directory. This issue is classified under CWEs-23 (Relative Path Traversal), CWE-26 (Relative Path Traversal), and CWE-22 (Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory), with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N), indicating high integrity impact potential over the network without authentication.
Unauthenticated remote attackers can exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted JSON payloads to the propose_edits endpoint, overwriting arbitrary files in directories writable by the application user, such as /cdn. Successful exploitation allows replacement of public-facing images or exhaustion of server storage by filling writable directories, potentially disrupting service availability or enabling defacement through altered content.
The vulnerability has been patched in commit 86f34c7, as detailed in the GitHub commit (https://github.com/TUM-Dev/NavigaTUM/commit/86f34c72886a59ec8f1e6c00f78a5ab889a70fd0), pull request #2650 (https://github.com/TUM-Dev/NavigaTUM/pull/2650), and security advisory GHSA-59hj-f48w-hjfm (https://github.com/TUM-Dev/NavigaTUM/security/advisories/GHSA-59hj-f48w-hjfm). Security practitioners should ensure deployments are updated to or beyond this commit to mitigate the issue.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-5325
Vulnerability Data
NavigaTUM is a website and API to search for rooms, buildings and other places. Prior to commit 86f34c7, there is a path traversal vulnerability in the propose_edits endpoint allows unauthenticated users to overwrite files in directories writable by the application…
more
user (e.g., /cdn). By supplying unsanitized file keys containing traversal sequences (e.g., ../../) in the JSON payload, an attacker can escape the intended temporary directory and replace public facing images or fill the server's storage. This issue has been patched via commit 86f34c7.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V5.3.2
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Enforces the intended directory access authorizations that path traversal would otherwise bypass.
Explicit validation of path inputs stops .. sequences from ever being interpreted by the file system.
Information-flow rules can be configured to reject traversals that would move data outside an approved directory boundary.
Least privilege reduces the set of reachable files even when a traversal succeeds.
Secure-engineering principles require safe pathname construction and input neutralization before any file operation.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and path sanitization that prevent relative traversal.
Vulnerability identification processes will discover path traversal flaws during scanning or testing.
Hardened configuration baselines can enforce directory restrictions that reduce exploitability.
Patching/maintenance can remediate known path-traversal flaws in deployed software (partial prevention of exploitability) but does nothing to stop the coding defect from being introduced in the first place.
PR.AA-05 defines and reviews access policies but does not address code-level pathname neutralization, so neither direction prevents CWE-22.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development catches path traversal via static/dynamic analysis, but does not itself implement the fix.
Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and path-handling controls that directly prevent relative path traversal.
Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against path traversal and other injection flaws.
Secure architecture principles include directory isolation and canonicalization, reducing but not eliminating traversal risk.
Secure coding standards require neutralizing path traversal sequences, directly addressing CWE-23.
Information access restriction limits which files can be reached, mitigating impact but not preventing the traversal flaw.