Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-28563

Apache Airflow 3.0.0 – 3.1.8

Published
17 March 2026
Modified
17 March 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 4.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0044 36th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-28563 is a medium-severity Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource (CWE-732) vulnerability in Apache Airflow. Its CVSS base score is 4.3 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique System Information Discovery (T1082); ranked at the 36th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Apache Airflow versions 3.1.0 through 3.1.7 /ui/dependencies endpoint returns the full DAG dependency graph without filtering by authorized DAG IDs. This allows an authenticated user with only DAG Dependencies permission to enumerate DAGs they are not authorized to view. Users…

more

are recommended to upgrade to Apache Airflow 3.1.8 or later, which resolves this issue.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1082 System Information Discovery Discovery
An adversary may attempt to get detailed information about the operating system and hardware, including version, patches, hotfixes, service packs, and architecture.
Why these techniques?

Unauthorized DAG enumeration via the vulnerable endpoint directly enables System Information Discovery (T1082) by exposing resource details without proper access controls.

Confidence: MEDIUM · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-26929Same product: Apache Airflow
CVE-2026-40690Same product: Apache Airflow
CVE-2026-40963Same product: Apache Airflow
CVE-2026-24098Same product: Apache Airflow
CVE-2026-48891Same product: Apache Airflow
CVE-2026-30912Same product: Apache Airflow
CVE-2023-22888Same product: Apache Airflow
CVE-2026-32228Same product: Apache Airflow
CVE-2025-68438Same product: Apache Airflow
CVE-2026-31987Same product: Apache Airflow

Affected Assets

apache
airflow
3.0.0 — 3.1.8

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • AC-3 Access Enforcement
  • AC-6 Least Privilege
  • AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 7 hardening rules · 4 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly enforces authorization checks on the /ui/dependencies endpoint so that DAG graph data is returned only for DAGs the caller is permitted to view.

prevent

Limits the DAG Dependencies permission to the minimum data required, preventing the broad enumeration that occurs when the permission grants unrestricted graph access.

prevent

Enforces information-flow rules that restrict dependency-graph content to only those DAG identifiers the user is authorized to receive.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 full match
prevents

Directly requires defining, enforcing, and reviewing access permissions and least privilege on resources.

PR.PS-01 mostly match
prevents

Hardened baselines and configuration management explicitly include correct permission settings for critical resources.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

By requiring owners to determine and document the exact permissions needed for each asset, the control reduces the likelihood that default or overly permissive file and resource permissions will be left in place.

prevents

Documented provisioning and revocation procedures reduce the chance that critical resources retain overly permissive default or leftover permissions after personnel changes.

prevents

Documented authorization, expiry rules, and audit logging of privileged accounts make it harder for critical resources to retain overly permissive or stale permission assignments.

prevents

Requiring explicit configuration of access controls and permissions for files, applications and services counters the assignment of overly permissive default or incorrect file-system rights.

prevents

Enforcing differentiated permissions on the source-code repository and program listings stops the assignment of overly broad default or inherited permissions to critical resources.

prevents

By defining and enforcing secure permission settings in configuration templates, the control reduces the likelihood that critical resources receive incorrect permission assignments.

References