Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-35091

Redhat Enterprise Linux 10.0 … 9.0

Public PoC
Published
01 April 2026
Modified
26 May 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 8.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0087 55th percentile
Risk Priority 63 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-35091 is a high-severity Incorrect Check of Function Return Value (CWE-253) vulnerability in Redhat Enterprise Linux. Its CVSS base score is 8.2 (High).

Operationally, ranked in the top 45% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-35091 is a wrong return value vulnerability in the Corosync membership commit token sanity check. A remote unauthenticated attacker can exploit it by sending a specially crafted User Datagram Protocol (UDP) packet, triggering an out-of-bounds read. This flaw affects Corosync when running in its default totemudp/totemudpu mode and can result in a denial of service (DoS) or the disclosure of limited memory contents. The vulnerability has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.2 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H) and is associated with CWE-253.

A remote unauthenticated attacker with network access to a vulnerable Corosync instance can exploit this issue without requiring privileges or user interaction. Exploitation involves transmitting a malicious UDP packet that bypasses the sanity check, leading to an out-of-bounds read. This primarily causes a DoS by crashing the service due to high availability impact, while potentially leaking limited memory contents as reflected in the low confidentiality score.

Red Hat advisories provide mitigations through patches in errata RHSA-2026:13644, RHSA-2026:13657, and RHSA-2026:13673. Further details on the vulnerability and remediation are documented on the Red Hat security page at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-35091 and Bugzilla entry https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2453169.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A flaw was found in Corosync. A remote unauthenticated attacker can exploit a wrong return value vulnerability in the Corosync membership commit token sanity check by sending a specially crafted User Datagram Protocol (UDP) packet. This can lead to an…

more

out-of-bounds read, causing a denial of service (DoS) and potentially disclosing limited memory contents

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-35092Same product: Corosync Corosync
CVE-2025-14512Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2024-45777Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2025-30472Same product: Corosync Corosync
CVE-2026-11820Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2023-0296Same product: Redhat Openshift
CVE-2026-11819Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2023-0229Same product: Redhat Openshift
CVE-2023-6121Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2026-59847Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux

Affected Assets

corosync
corosync
all versions
redhat
openshift
4.0
redhat
enterprise linux
10.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and code analysis can discover missing or incorrect return-value checks.

Documented development standards and tools can mandate verified checking of every function return value.

Security engineering principles include requirements for robust error checking of all function returns.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly enforce proper error-handling and return-value checking during development.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development catches missing or incorrect return-value checks.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates return-value checks and error handling, directly reducing CWE-253.

prevents

Application security requirements include robust error handling that mitigates incorrect return-value checks.

prevents

Secure architecture principles require defensive coding practices such as validating function results.

prevents

Secure coding explicitly demands checking return values, covering most of CWE-253.

References