Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2026-3622 is a high-severity Out-of-bounds Read (CWE-125) vulnerability in Tp-Link Tl-Wr841N Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.1 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 28th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-3622 is a vulnerability in the UPnP component of TP-Link TL-WR841N v14 routers, stemming from improper input validation that triggers an out-of-bounds read (CWE-125). This flaw affects firmware versions prior to EN_0.9.1 4.19 Build 260303 Rel.42399n (V14_260303) for international models and US_0.9.1.4.19 Build 260312 Rel.49108n (V14_0304) for US models. The issue has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H), highlighting its potential for high-impact availability disruption without requiring authentication or user interaction.
Attackers can exploit this vulnerability remotely over the network by sending malformed input to the UPnP service, causing an out-of-bounds read that crashes the service and results in a denial-of-service condition. No privileges are needed, and the low attack complexity makes it accessible to unauthenticated remote actors who can reach the device's UPnP interface, typically exposed if UPnP is enabled.
TP-Link advisories recommend updating to the specified firmware versions or later, available via their support download pages for TL-WR841N v14 (EN and US variants). Additional guidance is provided in their FAQ at https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/5033/, which likely details patching and configuration steps to mitigate the issue.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-16419
Vulnerability Data
The vulnerability exists in the UPnP component of TL-WR841N v14, where improper input validation leads to an out-of-bounds read, potentially causing a crash of the UPnP service. Successful exploitation can cause the UPnP service to crash, resulting in a Denial-of-Service…
more
condition. This vulnerability affects TL-WR841N v14 < EN_0.9.1 4.19 Build 260303 Rel.42399n (V14_260303) and < US_0.9.1.4.19 Build 260312 Rel. 49108n (V14_0304).
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation directly finds out-of-bounds read flaws through static analysis, fuzzing, and dynamic bounds checks.
Secure engineering principles require bounds checking and memory-safe constructs that stop out-of-bounds reads from being introduced.
Process isolation confines the effects of an out-of-bounds read to the compromised process.
Input validation rejects malformed indices or lengths that would otherwise cause reads outside buffer bounds.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices such as bounds checking and memory-safe languages directly prevent out-of-bounds reads.
Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover instances of out-of-bounds reads after code is deployed.
Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing out-of-bounds read flaws.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development and acceptance includes fuzzing and static analysis that detect out-of-bounds read defects before release.
Logging can record evidence of an out-of-bounds read but does not prevent the weakness itself.
Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and bounds checking that directly prevent out-of-bounds reads.
Application security requirements include explicit bounds and memory-safety specifications that mitigate buffer over-reads.
Secure system architecture and engineering principles require memory-safe design patterns and runtime protections against out-of-bounds access.
Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe pointer arithmetic and mandate bounds-checked reads, eliminating CWE-125.