Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2026-41415 is a medium-severity Out-of-bounds Read (CWE-125) vulnerability in Teluu Pjsip. Its CVSS base score is 6.7 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 24th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-41415 is an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in PJSIP, a free and open-source multimedia communication library written in C. Affecting versions 2.16 and earlier, the flaw occurs when parsing a malformed Content-ID URI in a SIP multipart message body, due to insufficient length validation that allows reads beyond the intended buffer bounds. This issue is classified under CWE-125 (Out-of-bounds Read) and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H).
The vulnerability can be exploited remotely over the network by any unauthenticated attacker with low complexity and no user interaction required. By sending a specially crafted SIP multipart message containing a malformed Content-ID URI, an attacker can trigger the out-of-bounds read, potentially leading to sensitive information disclosure from memory or a denial-of-service condition through application crash.
Mitigation is available via an upgrade to PJSIP version 2.17, where the issue is fixed, as detailed in the project's GitHub commit (4225a93c16661538005017883fbc8f1ea1d5f4b0) and security advisory (GHSA-935m-fmf5-j4pm). Security practitioners should prioritize patching affected PJSIP deployments in SIP-based systems.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-25597
Vulnerability Data
PJSIP is a free and open source multimedia communication library written in C. In 2.16 and earlier, there is an out-of-bounds read when parsing a malformed Content-ID URI in SIP multipart message body. Insufficient length validation can cause reads beyond…
more
the intended buffer bounds. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.17.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation directly finds out-of-bounds read flaws through static analysis, fuzzing, and dynamic bounds checks.
Secure engineering principles require bounds checking and memory-safe constructs that stop out-of-bounds reads from being introduced.
Process isolation confines the effects of an out-of-bounds read to the compromised process.
Input validation rejects malformed indices or lengths that would otherwise cause reads outside buffer bounds.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover instances of out-of-bounds reads after code is deployed.
Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing out-of-bounds read flaws.
Secure-development practices such as bounds checking and memory-safe languages directly prevent out-of-bounds reads.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Logging can record evidence of an out-of-bounds read but does not prevent the weakness itself.
Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and bounds checking that directly prevent out-of-bounds reads.
Application security requirements include explicit bounds and memory-safety specifications that mitigate buffer over-reads.
Secure system architecture and engineering principles require memory-safe design patterns and runtime protections against out-of-bounds access.
Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe pointer arithmetic and mandate bounds-checked reads, eliminating CWE-125.
Security testing in development and acceptance includes fuzzing and static analysis that detect out-of-bounds read defects before release.