Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-44467

Anthropic Claude Desktop 1.2581.0 – 1.4304.0

Published
13 May 2026
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 7.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0014 3th percentile
Risk Priority 55 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-44467 is a high-severity Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch (CWE-297) vulnerability in Anthropic Claude Desktop. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Adversary-in-the-Middle (T1557); ranked at the 3th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

This vulnerability is AI-related — categorised as Enterprise AI Assistants; in the Protocol-Specific Risks risk domain.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to IA-2 (Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users)) and IA-3 (Device Identification and Authentication) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

The Claude Desktop app gives you Claude Code with a graphical interface built for running multiple sessions side by side. From 1.2581.0 to before 1.4304.0, Claude Desktop's SSH remote development feature verified only whether a hostname existed in ~/.ssh/known_hosts without…

more

comparing the server's presented host key against the stored key. This allowed a network-positioned attacker to present an arbitrary SSH host key and have the connection silently accepted, enabling a man-in-the-middle attack on remote development sessions. Successful exploitation required the attacker to be in a network position to intercept SSH traffic (e.g., via ARP spoofing, rogue Wi-Fi, or DNS poisoning) and the target hostname to already have an entry in the victim's known_hosts file. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.4304.0.

CWE(s)

AI Security AnalysisAI

AI Category
Enterprise AI Assistants
Risk Domain
Protocol-Specific Risks
OWASP Top 10 for LLMs 2025
None mapped
Classification Reason
Matched keywords: claude

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1557 Adversary-in-the-Middle Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to position themselves between two or more networked devices using an adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) technique to support follow-on behaviors such as [Network Sniffing](https://attack.
T1557.001 Name Resolution Poisoning and SMB Relay Credential Access
By responding to LLMNR/NBT-NS/mDNS network traffic, adversaries may spoof an authoritative source for name resolution to force communication with an adversary controlled system.
T1557.002 ARP Cache Poisoning Credential Access
Adversaries may poison Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) caches to position themselves between the communication of two or more networked devices.
T1557.003 DHCP Spoofing Credential Access
Adversaries may redirect network traffic to adversary-owned systems by spoofing Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) traffic and acting as a malicious DHCP server on the victim network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-44470Same product: Anthropic Claude Desktop
CVE-2025-54794Same vendor: Anthropic
CVE-2026-33068Same vendor: Anthropic
CVE-2026-25725Same vendor: Anthropic
CVE-2025-65099Same vendor: Anthropic
CVE-2025-55284Same vendor: Anthropic
CVE-2026-25723Same vendor: Anthropic
CVE-2026-25724Same vendor: Anthropic
CVE-2026-24052Same vendor: Anthropic
CVE-2025-59041Same vendor: Anthropic

Affected Assets

anthropic
claude desktop
1.2581.0 — 1.4304.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V17.2.8
  • V12.1.3

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Requiring device identification and authentication before establishing connections prevents unauthenticated key exchanges with unknown devices.

Requiring unique identification and authentication of users before any privileged action stops key exchange from occurring with unauthenticated parties.

Requiring identification and authentication of non-organizational users blocks key exchange with unauthenticated external actors.

Requiring proper cryptographic key establishment and management directly stops unauthenticated key-exchange implementations.

Issuing or obtaining PKI certificates under an approved policy supplies the entity authentication missing from unauthenticated key exchange.

Protecting session authenticity structurally requires proper certificate validation to bind the presented certificate to the intended host.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-03 mostly match
prevents

Requiring authentication of services/hardware prevents unauthenticated key exchange.

PR.DS-02 mostly match
prevents

Protecting data-in-transit integrity depends on proper certificate validation to prevent MITM.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure development practices include coding correct certificate validation logic.

PR.AA-02 partial match
prevents

Identity proofing and binding directly supports verifying actors before key exchange.

PR.AA-04 partial match
prevents

Verifying identity assertions mitigates the missing entity authentication in key exchange.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Use of cryptography mandates authenticated key-exchange mechanisms, directly addressing the lack of entity authentication.

finds

Security testing can detect missing certificate validation and host-mismatch checks.

prevents

Secure authentication directly prevents unauthenticated key exchange by requiring verified identities before keys are established.

prevents

Identity management provides the verified identities required before key exchange occurs.

degrades

Network security controls include certificate validation and host-name verification to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks.

degrades

Security of network services requires proper TLS configuration and certificate validation for service endpoints.

References