CVE-2026-49427
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2026-49427 is a high-severity Premature Release of Resource During Expected Lifetime (CWE-826) vulnerability in Freebsd (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 20th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-62254
Vulnerability Data
Pages belonging to largepage shared memory objects were not explicitly wired. When sendfile(2) transmitted such an object with the SF_NOCACHE flag, it freed the underlying pages after transmission even though existing mappings still referred to them. An unprivileged local user…
more
can abuse the bug to access freed kernel memory. This can be exploited to escalate privileges.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover premature-release defects before deployment.
Engineering principles can require correct resource lifetime management so the premature-release pattern is never coded.
Process isolation confines the blast radius when a resource is released while still referenced inside another domain.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect premature-release bugs, providing partial mitigation.
Secure development lifecycle practices can include resource-lifetime checks that reduce premature-release defects.
Application security requirements can mandate explicit resource-release rules, partially addressing the weakness.
Secure architecture principles encourage proper resource scoping and lifetime management.
Secure coding standards directly prohibit premature resource release, covering most of the weakness.