Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-53405

Apache Syncope 3.0.0 – 3.0.16

Published
20 July 2026
Modified
27 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0044 36th percentile
Risk Priority 70 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-53405 is a critical-severity Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization (CWE-653) vulnerability in Apache Syncope. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 36th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-3 (Security Function Isolation) and SC-39 (Process Isolation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization vulnerability in Apache Syncope. An administrator with adequate entitlements can import arbitrary BPMN process definitions via the REST API and then start the process. When a BPMN process containing a Groovy scriptTask is imported and started,…

more

the Groovy script is executed directly on the server, with no sandbox. This issue affects Apache Syncope: from 3.0.0-M0 through 3.0.16, from 4.0.0-M0 Through 4.0.6, from 4.1.0-M0 through 4.1.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.0.7 / 4.1.2, which fix this issue by wrapping Flowable's Groovy scriptTasks with security sandbox.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Why these techniques?

Vulnerability enables arbitrary Groovy script execution (RCE) via unauthenticated or low-privileged REST API import/start of BPMN processes on a public-facing Apache Syncope server.

Confidence: HIGH · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-42782Same product: Apache Syncope
CVE-2026-53421Same product: Apache Syncope
CVE-2026-62418Same product: Apache Syncope
CVE-2026-63071Same product: Apache Syncope
CVE-2026-57308Same product: Apache Syncope
CVE-2025-57738Same product: Apache Syncope
CVE-2026-23794Same product: Apache Syncope
CVE-2024-45031Same product: Apache Syncope
CVE-2026-42797Same product: Apache Syncope
CVE-2024-38503Same product: Apache Syncope

Affected Assets

apache
syncope
3.0.0 — 3.0.16 · 4.0.0 — 4.0.7 · 4.1.0 — 4.1.2

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SC-39 Process Isolation
  • SC-3 Security Function Isolation
  • SC-32 System Partitioning
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 8 hardening rules · 7 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly enforces process isolation so that Groovy scriptTasks imported via BPMN cannot execute with full server privileges.

prevent

Requires isolation of security-relevant functions, preventing un-sandboxed script execution from affecting core system components.

prevent

Mandates system partitioning that can separate BPMN/Flowable processing from privileged server execution contexts.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 full match
prevents

Least-privilege policy directly enforces separation of privilege levels and access rights.

PR.IR-01 mostly match
prevents

Network and environment segmentation implements the isolation required to prevent unauthorized cross-compartment access.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

degrades

Segregation of duties directly enforces separation of privilege levels and functions.

prevents

Network segregation is a classic technical control for isolating different privilege domains.

prevents

Secure system architecture principles explicitly call for isolation and least-privilege boundaries.

prevents

Separation of development, test and production environments is a direct application of compartmentalization.

degrades

Access control policies establish the boundaries that isolation must enforce.

degrades

Managing access rights is the operational mechanism for compartmentalizing privileges.

References