Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-56775

Access Control in N8N ≤ 1.123.55

Public PoCAccess Control
Published
08 July 2026
Modified
08 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 5.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0018 7th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-56775 is a medium-severity Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) vulnerability in N8N N8N. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Local Accounts (T1078.003); ranked at the 7th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-6 (Least Privilege) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

n8n before 1.123.55, 2.25.7, and 2.26.2 contains an authorization vulnerability in three mutating evaluation test-run endpoints that authorize state-changing actions using the workflow:read scope instead of the action-appropriate workflow:execute scope. On instances using Advanced Permissions (Enterprise/Cloud) with projects and viewer…

more

roles, an authenticated user with the project:viewer role can start new evaluation test runs, cancel in-flight runs, and delete run records for workflows they only have read access to.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1078.003 Local Accounts Stealth
Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of a local account as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion.
T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
Why these techniques?

The vulnerability allows an authenticated user with insufficient permissions (project:viewer) to perform state-changing actions (starting, canceling, deleting evaluation test runs) on workflows they only have read access to, due to incorrect authorization scope checks. This maps to T1078.003 (Local Accounts) for abuse of valid but over-privileged accounts and T1068 (Exploitation for Privilege Escalation) for bypassing intended access controls to perform unauthorized actions.

Confidence: MEDIUM · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-56778Same product: N8N N8N
CVE-2026-54307Same product: N8N N8N
CVE-2026-33722Same product: N8N N8N
CVE-2026-65596Same product: N8N N8N
CVE-2026-65015Same product: N8N N8N
CVE-2026-33720Same product: N8N N8N
CVE-2026-56776Same product: N8N N8N
CVE-2026-65594Same product: N8N N8N
CVE-2025-68697Same product: N8N N8N
CVE-2026-65016Same product: N8N N8N

Affected Assets

n8n
n8n
≤ 1.123.55 · 2.0.0 — 2.25.7 · 2.26.0 — 2.26.2

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • AC-3 Access Enforcement
  • AC-6 Least Privilege
  • AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 5 hardening rules · 3 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Enforces that mutating evaluation test-run actions require the workflow:execute scope rather than the weaker workflow:read scope, directly blocking unauthorized state changes by project:viewer users.

prevent

Restricts the project:viewer role to read-only privileges on workflows, preventing execution, cancellation, or deletion of evaluation test runs.

prevent

Enforces information-flow rules so that a read-only viewer cannot trigger or alter workflow execution state through the evaluation endpoints.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 mostly match
prevents

Defining, enforcing, and reviewing access authorizations and least privilege directly prevents incorrect authorization checks.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Requiring consistency between access rights and classification plus formal approval steps ensures that the authorization logic correctly distinguishes between entities that should and should not be granted access.

prevents

Enforcing policy-driven approval and role-change reviews stops incorrect or stale authorization decisions from remaining in effect after job changes or terminations.

prevents

By tying access rights to identity, device, location and classification, the control reduces the likelihood that an authorization decision will be based on an incorrect or bypassed policy.

References