Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-58208

Linuxfoundation Nats-Server 2.12.0 – 2.12.12

Published
08 July 2026
Modified
09 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0034 26th percentile
Risk Priority 36 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-58208 is a medium-severity Uncaught Exception (CWE-248) vulnerability in Linuxfoundation Nats-Server. Its CVSS base score is 6.8 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004); ranked at the 26th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to CM-7 (Least Functionality) and SC-7 (Boundary Protection) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

NATS Server is a high-performance server for NATS.io, the cloud and edge native messaging system. Prior to 2.14.3 and 2.12.12, a WebSocket listener could route requests for the MQTT-over-WebSocket path into MQTT handling even when MQTT was not configured, allowing…

more

an unauthenticated client with access to the WebSocket listener to reach uninitialized MQTT state and crash the server process. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.3 and 2.12.12.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1499.004 Application or System Exploitation Impact
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities that can cause an application or system to crash and deny availability to users.
Why these techniques?

The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the NATS server by sending specially crafted WebSocket requests that reach uninitialized MQTT state, directly mapping to Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004) for denial of service.

Confidence: HIGH · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-58207Same product: Linuxfoundation Nats-Server
CVE-2026-58250Same product: Linuxfoundation Nats-Server
CVE-2026-33218Same product: Linuxfoundation Nats-Server
CVE-2026-33219Same product: Linuxfoundation Nats-Server
CVE-2026-27571Same product: Linuxfoundation Nats-Server
CVE-2026-29785Same product: Linuxfoundation Nats-Server
CVE-2026-27889Same product: Linuxfoundation Nats-Server
CVE-2026-33222Same product: Linuxfoundation Nats-Server
CVE-2026-58210Same product: Linuxfoundation Nats-Server
CVE-2026-58254Same product: Linuxfoundation Nats-Server

Affected Assets

linuxfoundation
nats-server
2.12.0 — 2.12.12 · 2.14.0 — 2.14.3

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SC-7 Boundary Protection
  • CM-7 Least Functionality
  • SI-2 Flaw Remediation
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Boundary protection can restrict WebSocket listener exposure and block unauthenticated traffic from reaching the uninitialized MQTT handler.

prevent

Least functionality disables the MQTT-over-WebSocket path entirely when MQTT is not configured, eliminating the crash vector.

prevent

Flaw remediation ensures the server is updated to 2.14.3+ / 2.12.12+ so the unauthenticated MQTT path is no longer reachable.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices explicitly require structured exception handling to prevent uncaught exceptions from reaching production.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing can detect uncaught exceptions before production deployment.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle includes exception-handling standards that reduce uncaught exceptions.

prevents

Application security requirements typically mandate robust error and exception handling.

prevents

Secure architecture principles call for centralized, comprehensive exception management.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly require catching and handling exceptions to prevent crashes or leaks.

References