CVE-2026-58455

RCE

Public PoCRCE Command Injection

Published

02 July 2026

Modified

14 July 2026

CVSS Score v4 9.2

Click a component to see what it means

Raw vector

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

EPSS Score 0.049 91th percentile

Risk Priority 52 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-58455 is a critical-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 9.2 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 9% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-41405

Vulnerability Data

Dockwatch through 0.6.567 contains an unauthenticated OS command injection vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands by exploiting a missing exit() after an authentication redirect in loader.php combined with unsanitized input passed to shell_exec() in ajax/compose.php. Attackers…

can seed the required session flag through the incomplete auth check, then inject arbitrary commands via the composePath POST parameter in the composePull action to achieve full host compromise, facilitated by the standard deployment mounting of the Docker socket.

CWE(s): CWE-78 CWE-698

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution

Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.

attack.mitre.org →

T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution

Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.

attack.mitre.org →

T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution

Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.

attack.mitre.org →

T1059.001 PowerShell Execution

Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.

attack.mitre.org →

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access

Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.

attack.mitre.org →

Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-0292Shared CWE-78

CVE-2023-40479Shared CWE-78

CVE-2025-33206Shared CWE-78

CVE-2026-32608Shared CWE-78

CVE-2024-9916Shared CWE-78

CVE-2026-8665Shared CWE-78

CVE-2026-71950Shared CWE-78

CVE-2024-32123Shared CWE-78

CVE-2024-0298Shared CWE-78

CVE-2020-37012Shared CWE-78

Affected Assets

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent

Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect

Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden

Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate

Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

V1.2.5
V1.2.8
V15.2.5

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation good match

Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing or incorrect command sanitization during development.

SI-10 Information Input Validation good match

Input validation directly neutralizes or rejects special characters that would otherwise alter OS command structure.

AC-3 Access Enforcement partial match

Proper access enforcement reduces the impact of continued execution after a redirect by limiting what the remaining code can do.

AC-6 Least Privilege partial match

Least privilege reduces the permissions available to any process that could be subverted by injected commands.

CM-7 Least Functionality partial match

Least functionality restricts available OS commands and interpreters, limiting the blast radius of injection.

SA-15 Development Process, Standards, and Tools partial match

Requiring a documented secure development process and standards can mandate exiting immediately after issuing redirects.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match

prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.

PR.PS-02 partial match

prevents

Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match

finds

Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.

A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match

prevents

Secure development lifecycle requires proper handling of redirects and exit logic, reducing EAR risk.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match

prevents

Application security requirements can mandate safe redirect patterns and post-redirect termination.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles partial match

prevents

Secure architecture principles discourage continued execution after redirects.

A.8.28 Secure coding partial match

prevents

Secure coding standards directly address proper redirect handling and flow termination.