Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-64641

DoS in Vercel Next.Js 13.0.0 – 15.5.21

Published
27 July 2026
Modified
29 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 8.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0060 46th percentile
Risk Priority 44 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-64641 is a high-severity Excessive Iteration (CWE-834) vulnerability in Vercel Next.Js. Its CVSS base score is 8.2 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499); ranked at the 46th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) and SC-6 (Resource Availability) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. In versions 13.0.0 through 15.5.20 and 16.0.0 through 16.2.10, crafted requests targeting Next.js applications using App Router with at least one Server Action can lead to excessive CPU usage blocking…

more

processing of further requests in the same process. This issue has been fixed in versions 15.5.21 and 16.2.11.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Endpoint Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of services to users.
T1499.003 Application Exhaustion Flood Impact
Adversaries may target resource intensive features of applications to cause a denial of service (DoS), denying availability to those applications.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-47831Same product: Vercel Next.Js
CVE-2026-27980Same product: Vercel Next.Js
CVE-2024-39693Same product: Vercel Next.Js
CVE-2025-59471Same product: Vercel Next.Js
CVE-2025-59472Same product: Vercel Next.Js
CVE-2026-44579Same product: Vercel Next.Js
CVE-2026-44577Same product: Vercel Next.Js
CVE-2024-56332Same product: Vercel Next.Js
CVE-2026-27979Same product: Vercel Next.Js
CVE-2024-51479Same product: Vercel Next.Js

Affected Assets

vercel
next.js
13.0.0 — 15.5.21 · 16.0.0 — 16.2.11

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 2 hardening rules · 2 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Engineering principles can require developers to bound all loops and iterations at design time.

Resource quotas limit the CPU/time impact of an excessively long loop without eliminating the flaw.

Input validation can reject or sanitize data that would otherwise drive unbounded iteration.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent unbounded loops via code review, static analysis, and testing.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect excessive iteration through stress and fuzz testing.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle requires input validation and loop bounds, directly limiting excessive iteration.

prevents

Application security requirements include resource-consumption limits that prevent unbounded loops.

prevents

Secure architecture principles mandate defensive coding patterns such as loop termination checks.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unbounded loops and require explicit iteration limits.

References