Security Resilience

CVE-2026-87072

Access Control in Tanium Comply 2.32.0 – 2.32.252

Published
09 September 2026
Modified
16 September 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0029 22th percentile
Risk Priority 53 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). EPSS, Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams (FIRST), epss.first.org. Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-87072 is a high-severity Missing Authorization (CWE-862) vulnerability in Tanium Comply. Its CVSS base score is 7.1 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 22th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-24 (Access Control Decisions) and AC-25 (Reference Monitor) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Comply.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-32832Shared CWE-862
CVE-2024-31347Shared CWE-862
CVE-2024-10528Shared CWE-862
CVE-2024-32675Shared CWE-862
CVE-2024-7258Shared CWE-862
CVE-2025-26773Shared CWE-862
CVE-2023-0019Shared CWE-862
CVE-2024-7491Shared CWE-862
CVE-2025-22770Shared CWE-862
CVE-2024-6883Shared CWE-862

Affected Assets

tanium
comply
2.32.0 — 2.32.252 · 2.35.0 — 2.35.306 · 2.37.0 — 2.37.308

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5)

Our mappings, made for this CVE.

AC-3 directly requires enforcement of authorization decisions on every access request, structurally eliminating missing authorization checks.

AC-24 mandates that access control decisions are applied to each request, preventing bypass of authorization logic.

AC-25 requires a tamperproof, always-invoked reference monitor that ensures authorization checks cannot be omitted.

AC-6 reduces the set of actions reachable without proper authorization, limiting blast radius of missing checks.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A)

Our mappings, derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our CWE→ISO cross-walk — links open the control.

blocks

A.8.3's purpose is to ensure only authorized access, and its guidance directly mandates the authorization checks that CWE-862 describes as missing, so a well-implemented access restriction control fully blocks exploitation of the missing authorization weakness.

blocks

Requiring formal authorization of every access request before rights are granted ensures that checks for required permissions are performed, preventing missing authorization checks from being introduced.

finds

By requiring competent outsiders to verify that every function enforces the need-to-know principle, the control lowers the likelihood that missing authorization checks persist undetected.

blocks

Requiring evidence of minimum security capabilities and acceptance testing ensures that missing or bypassed authorization checks are detected before the delivered software is accepted.

finds

Mandating read-only access or proxy execution by an authorized administrator ensures every requested operation is explicitly authorized before it occurs.

blocks

Mandatory authorization checks before allowing modifications ensure that every sensitive action on source code is preceded by an explicit access-control decision.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-862, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References