Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-92126

Jenkins Script Security ≤ 1415.v9a_f9b_3a_c253d

Published
16 September 2026
Modified
21 September 2026
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0020 11th percentile
Risk Priority 58 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-92126 is a high-severity Unsafe Reflection (CWE-470) vulnerability in Jenkins Script Security. Its CVSS base score is 8.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Reflective Code Loading (T1620); ranked at the 11th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

A05:2025 Injection

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1415.v9a_f9b_3a_c253d and earlier does not reject @Builder annotations whose builderStrategy member names an arbitrary class, allowing attackers with permission to define and run sandboxed scripts, including Pipelines, to execute code outside the sandbox if a suitable…

more

class is present on the classpath of the component that evaluates the script.

CWE(s)
CWE-470

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1620 Reflective Code Loading Stealth
Adversaries may reflectively load code into a process in order to conceal the execution of malicious payloads.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

Affected Assets

jenkins
script security
≤ 1415.v9a_f9b_3a_c253d

Mitigating Controls

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

SC-44 Detonation Chambers
addresses: CWE-470

Externally controlled class or code selection can be resolved and invoked inside the chamber, surfacing unsafe reflection without system impact.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes can discover unsafe reflection during code review or scanning.

PR.PS-05 partial match
prevents

Preventing execution of unauthorized code can block exploitation of unsafe reflection at runtime.

PR.PS-06 partial match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly avoid introducing externally controlled class selection via reflection.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match
prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and design reviews that reduce unsafe reflection risks.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
prevents

Application security requirements can explicitly prohibit or constrain reflection based on untrusted input.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles partial match
prevents

Secure architecture principles discourage dynamic class loading from external data sources.

A.8.28 Secure coding partial match
prevents

Secure coding standards directly forbid unsafe reflection and require whitelisting or static alternatives.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance partial match
finds

Security testing can detect and block unsafe reflection patterns before release.

References