Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2025-31722 is a high-severity Code Injection (CWE-94) vulnerability in Jenkins Templating Engine. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 33% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
The vulnerability affects the Jenkins Templating Engine Plugin versions 2.5.3 and earlier. Libraries defined within folders bypass the plugin's sandbox protections entirely, exposing a code injection flaw (CWE-94) that permits execution of attacker-supplied code inside the Jenkins controller JVM. The issue carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.8.
An attacker who already possesses Item/Configure permission on a folder can define a malicious library that runs without sandbox restrictions, achieving arbitrary code execution on the controller with full access to its runtime environment and any connected agents or credentials.
The official Jenkins security advisory published on 2025-04-02 under SECURITY-3505 describes the flaw and the corresponding plugin update that restores sandbox enforcement for folder-scoped libraries. The associated EPSS score remains low, with a current value of 0.0091 and a peak of 0.0114.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-9533
Vulnerability Data
In Jenkins Templating Engine Plugin 2.5.3 and earlier, libraries defined in folders are not subject to sandbox protection, allowing attackers with Item/Configure permission to execute arbitrary code in the context of the Jenkins controller JVM.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.3.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation finds code paths that accept and execute externally influenced strings.
Input validation directly stops untrusted data from being used to construct executable code without neutralization.
Least privilege limits the damage an injected code fragment can perform once executed.
Requiring documented secure development standards and tools enforces use of safe code-generation APIs and escaping.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly target injection flaws via secure coding and testing (mostly), yet as a single broad outcome it leaves many code-generation specifics unaddressed (partial).
PR.DS-10 protects runtime data confidentiality/integrity but has no bearing on neutralizing externally influenced input during code generation, so neither direction shows any preventive effect.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Banning unapproved code samples and unauthenticated web services, combined with secure-coding standards and SAST, prevents the dynamic generation or inclusion of attacker-supplied code.