Security Resilience

CVE-2018-0296

Path Traversal in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software 9.1 – 9.1.7.29

CISA KEVActive ExploitationEUVD ExploitedPublic PoCPath Traversal
Published
07 June 2018
Modified
11 August 2026
KEV Added
03 November 2021
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.99 100.0th percentile
Risk Priority 84 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2018-0296 is a high-severity Improper Input Validation (CWE-20) vulnerability in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Data Obfuscation (T1001); ranked in the top 0.0% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

A vulnerability in the web interface of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) software stems from insufficient input validation of HTTP URLs, tracked as Cisco Bug ID CSCvi16029. It affects Cisco ASA Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software running on products such as the 3000 Series Industrial Security Appliance, ASA 1000V Cloud Firewall, ASA 5500 Series, ASA 5500-X Series, ASA Services Module, Adaptive Security Virtual Appliance, Firepower 2100/4100/9300 Series appliances, and their virtual counterparts. The flaw is also associated with CWE-20 and CWE-22, carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5, and impacts both IPv4 and IPv6 HTTP traffic; on certain releases it enables directory traversal in addition to denial of service.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger the issue by sending a specially crafted HTTP request to an affected device. Depending on the software release, this may cause an unexpected reload resulting in a denial-of-service condition or allow viewing of sensitive system information without authentication.

Public references, including the Cisco Security Advisory cisco-sa-20180606-asaftd, ICS-CERT advisory ICSA-18-184-01, SecurityTracker, SecurityFocus, and a Packet Storm entry describing path traversal, indicate that mitigation details and patch availability are addressed in vendor advisories.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability in the web interface of the Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. It is also possible on…

more

certain software releases that the ASA will not reload, but an attacker could view sensitive system information without authentication by using directory traversal techniques. The vulnerability is due to lack of proper input validation of the HTTP URL. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. An exploit could allow the attacker to cause a DoS condition or unauthenticated disclosure of information. This vulnerability applies to IPv4 and IPv6 HTTP traffic. This vulnerability affects Cisco ASA Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software that is running on the following Cisco products: 3000 Series Industrial Security Appliance (ISA), ASA 1000V Cloud Firewall, ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, ASA 5500-X Series Next-Generation Firewalls, ASA Services Module for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Switches and Cisco 7600 Series Routers, Adaptive Security Virtual Appliance (ASAv), Firepower 2100 Series Security Appliance, Firepower 4100 Series Security Appliance, Firepower 9300 ASA Security Module, FTD Virtual (FTDv). Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvi16029.

CWE(s)
KEV Date Added
03 November 2021

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1001 Data Obfuscation Command And Control
Adversaries may obfuscate command and control traffic to make it more difficult to detect.
T1003.003 NTDS Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access or create a copy of the Active Directory domain database in order to steal credential information, as well as obtain other information about domain members such as devices, users, and access rights.
T1003.004 LSA Secrets Credential Access
Adversaries with SYSTEM access to a host may attempt to access Local Security Authority (LSA) secrets, which can contain a variety of different credential materials, such as credentials for service accounts.
T1003.006 DCSync Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access credentials and other sensitive information by abusing a Windows Domain Controller's application programming interface (API)(Citation: Microsoft DRSR Dec 2017) (Citation: Microsoft GetNCCChanges) (Citati…
T1016.001 Internet Connection Discovery Discovery
Adversaries may check for Internet connectivity on compromised systems.
T1018 Remote System Discovery Discovery
Adversaries may attempt to get a listing of other systems by IP address, hostname, or other logical identifier on a network that may be used for Lateral Movement from the current system.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2020-3452Same product: Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Softwareboth on KEV
CVE-2015-0666Same vendor: Ciscoboth on KEV
CVE-2026-20262Same vendor: Ciscoboth on KEV
CVE-2022-20775Same vendor: Ciscoboth on KEV
CVE-2020-3248Same vendor: Cisco
CVE-2020-3239Same vendor: Cisco
CVE-2020-3251Same vendor: Cisco
CVE-2020-3247Same vendor: Cisco
CVE-2020-3187Same product: Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software
CVE-2026-20181Same vendor: Cisco

Affected Assets

cisco
adaptive security appliance software
9.1 — 9.1.7.29 · 9.2 — 9.2.4.33 · 9.3 — 9.4.4.18
cisco
firepower threat defense
6.2.3-85.02, 6.2.3-851
cisco
secure firewall threat defense
6.2.3, 6.2.3.1 · 6.0 — 6.1.0 · 6.2.1 — 6.2.2.3

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.3.2

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-20 CWE-22

Directly implements checks on information inputs to reject invalid data before processing.

addresses: CWE-20

Security testing and developer training directly verify and enforce proper input validation, reducing exploitability of injection and malformed-data weaknesses.

addresses: CWE-20

Security testing and evaluation at multiple SDLC stages directly detects missing or flawed input validation, with the required remediation process ensuring fixes are applied.

addresses: CWE-20

Spam protection mechanisms perform filtering and detection on inbound/outbound messages, directly compensating for missing or weak input validation of unsolicited content.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-02 partial match
blocks

Patching/maintenance can remediate known path-traversal flaws in deployed software (partial prevention of exploitability) but does nothing to stop the coding defect from being introduced in the first place.

PR.AA-05 none match
blocks

PR.AA-05 defines and reviews access policies but does not address code-level pathname neutralization, so neither direction prevents CWE-22.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

removes
removes
removes
removes
removes

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-20, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References