CVE-2018-10562
RCE in Dasannetworks Gpon Router Firmware
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2018-10562 is a critical-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Dasannetworks Gpon Router Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 0.0% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2018-10562 is an OS command injection vulnerability, tracked under CWE-78, that affects Dasan GPON home routers. The flaw resides in the handling of the dest_host parameter within diag_action=ping requests sent to the GponForm/diag_Form URI; because results are written to /tmp and later served back when a user revisits /diag.html, arbitrary commands can be executed and their output retrieved.
The issue can be exploited remotely by unauthenticated attackers over the network. A single crafted HTTP request is sufficient to inject shell commands, and the stored output mechanism makes command results directly accessible without additional authentication or interaction.
Public exploit code for the vulnerability has been available since shortly after disclosure, consistent with its CVSS 9.8 rating that reflects no required privileges or user interaction.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2018-2634
Vulnerability Data
An issue was discovered on Dasan GPON home routers. Command Injection can occur via the dest_host parameter in a diag_action=ping request to a GponForm/diag_Form URI. Because the router saves ping results in /tmp and transmits them to the user when…
more
the user revisits /diag.html, it's quite simple to execute commands and retrieve their output.
- CWE(s)
- KEV Date Added
- 31 March 2022
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.5V1.2.8V15.2.5
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.
Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.