CVE-2018-14634
Memory Safety in F5 Big-Ip Access Policy Manager 11.2.1 – 11.6.4
Raw vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2018-14634 is a high-severity Integer Overflow or Wraparound (CWE-190) vulnerability in F5 Big-Ip Access Policy Manager. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 4% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
An integer overflow flaw was found in the Linux kernel's create_elf_tables() function, tracked as CVE-2018-14634 and CWE-190. The issue affects kernel versions 2.6.x, 3.10.x, and 4.14.x and carries a CVSS 3.0 base score of 7.8.
An unprivileged local user with access to an SUID binary or other privileged executable can exploit the flaw to escalate privileges on the affected system. The attack requires local access but no user interaction and results in full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Red Hat has published errata RHSA-2018:2748, RHSA-2018:2763, and RHSA-2018:2846 that provide updated kernels; additional details appear in the referenced Openwall and SecurityFocus entries. No information on observed in-the-wild exploitation is supplied in the source data.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2018-6537
Vulnerability Data
An integer overflow flaw was found in the Linux kernel's create_elf_tables() function. An unprivileged local user with access to SUID (or otherwise privileged) binary could use this flaw to escalate their privileges on the system. Kernel versions 2.6.x, 3.10.x and…
more
4.14.x are believed to be vulnerable.
- CWE(s)
- KEV Date Added
- 26 January 2026
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V5.2.6
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require use of safe arithmetic, bounds checks, and testing that prevent integer overflows.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development can detect integer overflows before release.
Secure SDLC mandates input validation and arithmetic checks that prevent integer overflows.
Application security requirements include bounds checking and safe arithmetic to avoid overflow conditions.
Secure architecture principles require defensive coding patterns that mitigate integer wraparound risks.
Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe integer operations and mandate overflow-safe constructs.