Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2019-0752 is a high-severity Type Confusion (CWE-843) vulnerability in Microsoft Windows 10 1709. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 0.4% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
A remote code execution vulnerability tracked as CVE-2019-0752 exists in the scripting engine of Internet Explorer due to improper handling of objects in memory, resulting in memory corruption. The issue is classified under CWE-843 and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 reflecting network attack vector, high complexity, no required privileges, and required user interaction.
An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger the flaw by causing a victim to visit a malicious web page in Internet Explorer, achieving arbitrary code execution that impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability on the affected system. The vulnerability is distinct from several related scripting engine issues disclosed around the same time.
Microsoft has published guidance for CVE-2019-0752 through its security advisory portal, and additional technical details are available from the Zero Day Initiative. Public exploit code referencing affected builds such as Windows 10 1809 version 17763.316 has also been posted to Packet Storm.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2019-1511
Vulnerability Data
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Internet Explorer, aka 'Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0739, CVE-2019-0753, CVE-2019-0862.
- CWE(s)
- KEV Date Added
- 15 February 2022
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.5.2V3.2.3V15.3.5
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly prevent type-confusion flaws via safe typing, static analysis, and code review while the control itself addresses many additional weaknesses.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development can detect type-confusion vulnerabilities through fuzzing and static analysis.
Secure SDLC mandates type-safe design and review that can catch type-confusion flaws.
Application security requirements can specify strong typing and interface contracts that reduce type confusion.
Secure architecture principles promote type-safe languages and memory-safety mechanisms that mitigate type confusion.
Secure coding standards directly forbid unsafe type casts and require static-analysis checks for type confusion.