Security Resilience

CVE-2019-19006

Auth Bypass in Sangoma Freepbx 13.0.0.0 – 13.0.197.13

CISA KEVActive ExploitationEUVD ExploitedPublic PoCAuth Bypass
Published
21 November 2019
Modified
17 June 2026
KEV Added
03 February 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.56 99.0th percentile
Risk Priority 97 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2019-19006 is a critical-severity Improper Authentication (CWE-287) vulnerability in Sangoma Freepbx. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, ranked in the top 1.0% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

Sangoma FreePBX versions 15.0.16.26 and below, 14.0.13.11 and below, and 13.0.197.13 and below contain an incorrect access control vulnerability tracked as CWE-287. The issue is rated 9.8 under CVSS 3.1 with a vector of AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, reflecting network-accessible improper authentication that affects the administrative interface of the PBX platform.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the flaw to bypass login controls entirely, obtaining administrative privileges that permit arbitrary changes to system configuration, call routing, user accounts, and other sensitive PBX functions.

Public advisories published by Sangoma and the FreePBX project under identifier SEC-2019-001 describe the issue as a remote admin authentication bypass and direct administrators to the project wiki and community forums for patch availability and remediation steps.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Sangoma FreePBX 115.0.16.26 and below, 14.0.13.11 and below, 13.0.197.13 and below have Incorrect Access Control.

CWE(s)
KEV Date Added
03 February 2026

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-66039Same product: Sangoma Freepbx
CVE-2025-57819Same product: Sangoma Freepbxboth on KEV
CVE-2026-28210Same product: Sangoma Freepbx
CVE-2025-59429Same product: Sangoma Freepbx
CVE-2026-44238Same product: Sangoma Freepbx
CVE-2025-55211Same product: Sangoma Freepbx
CVE-2024-53564Same product: Sangoma Freepbx
CVE-2025-67722Same product: Sangoma Freepbx
CVE-2025-59056Same product: Sangoma Freepbx
CVE-2024-58294Same product: Sangoma Freepbx

Affected Assets

sangoma
freepbx
13.0.0.0 — 13.0.197.13 · 14.0.0.0 — 14.0.13.11 · 15.0.0.0 — 15.0.16.26

Mitigating Controls

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-287

Detects unauthorized successful logons resulting from improper authentication implementations.

addresses: CWE-287

Documented procedures ensure personnel are trained on authentication mechanisms, tangibly lowering the risk of improper authentication being exploited.

addresses: CWE-287

Security awareness training instructs users on secure authentication practices and avoiding credential compromise.

addresses: CWE-287

Training on authentication mechanisms and best practices decreases the occurrence of improper authentication.

addresses: CWE-287

Non-repudiation requires strong authentication mechanisms to irrefutably attribute performed actions to specific individuals or processes.

addresses: CWE-287

Session content review can reveal authentication bypasses or failures in session establishment.

addresses: CWE-287

Review of authentication-related audit records can detect improper authentication mechanisms or bypasses.

addresses: CWE-287

Assessments check authentication mechanisms for correct implementation and effectiveness, reducing successful authentication bypass attempts.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

Mandating segregated approval and oversight for non-human identities reduces the chance that weak or orphaned credentials can be exploited for unauthorized authentication.

blocks

A.5.17 directly mandates generation of non-guessable unique secrets, secure transmission, immediate change of defaults/temporary creds, strong password enforcement, no-reuse, and compromise response, which stops most improper-authentication exploits at source; the bounded remainder is non-password authentication methods and sufficiency-of-proof cases (e.g. IA-2/IA-5 enhancements) left to other controls.

blocks

Security requirements specified early and verified through testing drive the consistent implementation of authentication mechanisms, decreasing the likelihood that authentication steps are omitted or incorrectly applied.

blocks

A.8.26 explicitly requires identifying and addressing authentication-related requirements (including level of trust in identity via 8.5 and 5.17) as part of application development or acquisition, which prevents a slice of CWE-287 but leaves the dominant sufficiency-of-proof aspects (IA-2/IA-5) and many implementation defects untouched.

blocks

A.8.27 mandates security-by-design principles (least privilege, default-deny, never-trust/always-verify, MFA, end-to-end encryption of requests, distrust-external-input, secure session control, and explicit authentication/authorization in every layer), which directly stops most improper-authentication flaws from being exploitable; the bounded remainder is insufficient-proof cases that live only in the strength or correctness of the credential itself (IA-5/IA-2 territory).

blocks

A.8.5 directly mandates appropriate-strength authentication techniques, MFA for critical systems, protected log-on procedures, brute-force resistance, no cleartext passwords/transmission, and session controls that stop exploitation of insufficient proof of identity; the bounded remainder is cases where the chosen technique itself is flawed or insufficiently implemented (e.g. weak biometrics without fallback).

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-287, a class-level weakness. Rules are authored against its narrower children: CWE-295, CWE-306.

References