CVE-2020-6418
Memory Safety in Fedoraproject Fedora 30 … 31
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2020-6418 is a high-severity Type Confusion (CWE-843) vulnerability in Fedoraproject Fedora. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 0.4% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
The vulnerability CVE-2020-6418 is a type confusion flaw (CWE-843) in the V8 JavaScript engine of Google Chrome versions prior to 80.0.3987.122. It can result in heap corruption when the engine processes certain inputs, carrying a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.8.
A remote attacker can trigger the issue by serving a crafted HTML page to a victim, enabling exploitation of the resulting memory corruption to potentially compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability without requiring authentication.
Advisories and patches direct users to upgrade Chrome to 80.0.3987.122 or newer; Red Hat and Fedora have issued corresponding errata (RHSA-2020:0738 and Fedora package updates) that address the affected browser packages.
Public references include a detailed Chromium bug report and a proof-of-concept demonstrating side-effect handling during JSCreate operations that leads to the type confusion.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2020-27568
Vulnerability Data
Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 80.0.3987.122 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page.
- CWE(s)
- KEV Date Added
- 03 November 2021
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.5.2V3.2.3V15.3.5
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly prevent type-confusion flaws via safe typing, static analysis, and code review while the control itself addresses many additional weaknesses.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development can detect type-confusion vulnerabilities through fuzzing and static analysis.
Secure SDLC mandates type-safe design and review that can catch type-confusion flaws.
Application security requirements can specify strong typing and interface contracts that reduce type confusion.
Secure architecture principles promote type-safe languages and memory-safety mechanisms that mitigate type confusion.
Secure coding standards directly forbid unsafe type casts and require static-analysis checks for type confusion.