Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2020-8816 is a high-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Pi-Hole Pi-Hole. Its CVSS base score is 7.2 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 0.5% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
Pi-hole Web version 4.3.2, also known as AdminLTE, contains an OS command injection vulnerability tracked as CVE-2020-8816 and CWE-78. The flaw resides in the handling of DHCP static lease entries on the administrative dashboard and permits remote code execution when an attacker supplies a specially crafted MAC address or hostname value.
An authenticated user with dashboard privileges can exploit the issue over the network by submitting a malicious static lease through the web interface. Successful exploitation grants the attacker the ability to execute arbitrary operating-system commands, resulting in complete control over the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected Pi-hole instance.
The project addressed the vulnerability in release 4.3.3; the corresponding fix is documented in pull request 1165 and the associated commit history on the AdminLTE repository. Public exploit code demonstrating both the DHCP lease injection and full remote code execution has been published on Packet Storm.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2020-29664
Vulnerability Data
Pi-hole Web v4.3.2 (aka AdminLTE) allows Remote Code Execution by privileged dashboard users via a crafted DHCP static lease.
- CWE(s)
- KEV Date Added
- 10 December 2021
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.5V1.2.8V15.2.5
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.
Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.