Security Resilience

CVE-2021-22205

RCE in Gitlab 11.9.0 – 13.8.8

CISA KEVActive ExploitationEUVD ExploitedPublic PoCRansomware-linkedRCE
Published
23 April 2021
Modified
06 August 2026
KEV Added
03 November 2021
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 10.0
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.99 100.0th percentile
Risk Priority 100 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2021-22205 is a critical-severity Code Injection (CWE-94) vulnerability in Gitlab Gitlab. Its CVSS base score is 10.0 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Junk Data (T1001.001); ranked in the top 0.0% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

The vulnerability CVE-2021-22205 is an improper input validation flaw under CWE-94 that affects GitLab Community Edition and Enterprise Edition in all versions starting from 11.9. GitLab failed to properly validate image files passed to a file parser, resulting in remote command execution.

This issue can be exploited remotely by unauthenticated attackers over the network with low attack complexity and no required user interaction. A successful attack yields complete impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 10.0 reflecting the potential for full system compromise.

References such as the GitLab CVE repository entry, associated issue tracker, and HackerOne report point to official advisories and patches for remediation, while public exploit artifacts on PacketStorm demonstrate practical attack methods against the affected versions.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 11.9. GitLab was not properly validating image files that were passed to a file parser which resulted in a remote command execution.

CWE(s)
KEV Date Added
03 November 2021

Related Threats

Threat-Actor AttributionAI

Microsoft Corp. (Salesforce / Slack engineer recruitment claims)
Top CVEs Actively Exploited By People’s Republic of China State-Sponsored Cyber Actors | CISA
HAFNIUM (G0125)
Top CVEs Actively Exploited By People’s Republic of China State-Sponsored Cyber Actors | CISA
AnonOps
Top CVEs Actively Exploited By People’s Republic of China State-Sponsored Cyber Actors | CISA
Apple Inc. (Masimo pulse-oximetry trade-secret 2020-2024)
2023 Top Routinely Exploited Vulnerabilities | CISA
Clop
2023 Top Routinely Exploited Vulnerabilities | CISA
Flax Typhoon
Chinese Government-linked Cyber Threat Actors Combine Automated and Hands-on Hacking Tools to Steal Sensitive Data | CISA

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1001.001 Junk Data Command And Control
Adversaries may add junk data to protocols used for command and control to make detection more difficult.
T1001.003 Protocol or Service Impersonation Command And Control
Adversaries may impersonate legitimate protocols or web service traffic to disguise command and control activity and thwart analysis efforts.
T1003.006 DCSync Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access credentials and other sensitive information by abusing a Windows Domain Controller's application programming interface (API)(Citation: Microsoft DRSR Dec 2017) (Citation: Microsoft GetNCCChanges) (Citati…
T1003.007 Proc Filesystem Credential Access
Adversaries may gather credentials from the proc filesystem or `/proc`.
T1003.008 /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to dump the contents of <code>/etc/passwd</code> and <code>/etc/shadow</code> to enable offline password cracking.
T1007 System Service Discovery Discovery
Adversaries may try to gather information about registered local system services.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-3958Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2026-19478Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2023-6051Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2026-1606Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2026-1516Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2025-12669Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2023-1178Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2023-3401Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2025-5101Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2023-5226Same product: Gitlab Gitlab

Affected Assets

gitlab
gitlab
11.9.0 — 13.8.8 · 11.9.0 — 13.8.8 · 13.9.0 — 13.9.6

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.3.1

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-94

Makes persistent code injection into loaded programs impossible when the executable image itself resides on hardware-protected read-only media.

addresses: CWE-94

Dynamically generated code can be produced and executed inside the isolated chamber, preventing host compromise from code-injection payloads.

addresses: CWE-94

Validates inputs used in dynamic code generation to block injected directives.

addresses: CWE-94

Directly prevents execution of attacker-supplied code written into data memory regions.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
blocks

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly target injection flaws via secure coding and testing (mostly), yet as a single broad outcome it leaves many code-generation specifics unaddressed (partial).

PR.DS-10 none match
blocks

PR.DS-10 protects runtime data confidentiality/integrity but has no bearing on neutralizing externally influenced input during code generation, so neither direction shows any preventive effect.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

removes
removes
removes
removes
removes

References