Security Resilience

CVE-2021-23874

LPE in Mcafee Total Protection ≤ 16.0.30

CISA KEVActive ExploitationEUVD ExploitedLPE
Published
10 February 2021
Modified
03 November 2025
KEV Added
03 November 2021
CVSS Score v3.1 8.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.010 63th percentile
Risk Priority 84 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2021-23874 is a high-severity Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269) vulnerability in Mcafee Total Protection. Its CVSS base score is 8.2 (High).

Operationally, ranked in the top 37% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2021-23874 is an arbitrary process execution vulnerability affecting McAfee Total Protection (MTP) versions prior to 16.0.30. It is associated with CWE-269 and CWE-732 and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.2 reflecting local attack vector, low attack complexity, and high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability under a changed scope.

A local user can exploit the flaw to bypass MTP self-defense mechanisms, obtain elevated privileges, and execute arbitrary code on the affected system.

McAfee has published remediation guidance in FAQ document TS103114, while the presence of the CVE in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog indicates confirmed real-world exploitation activity.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Arbitrary Process Execution vulnerability in McAfee Total Protection (MTP) prior to 16.0.30 allows a local user to gain elevated privileges and execute arbitrary code bypassing MTP self-defense.

CWE(s)
KEV Date Added
03 November 2021

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-24579Same product: Mcafee Total Protection
CVE-2023-24578Same product: Mcafee Total Protection
CVE-2023-24577Same product: Mcafee Total Protection
CVE-2023-25134Same product: Mcafee Total Protection
CVE-2023-0221Same vendor: Mcafee
CVE-2021-20021Shared CWE-269both on KEV
CVE-2002-0367Shared CWE-269both on KEV
CVE-2024-26169Shared CWE-269both on KEV
CVE-2017-5689Shared CWE-269both on KEV
CVE-2023-3946Same vendor: Mcafee

Affected Assets

mcafee
total protection
≤ 16.0.30

Mitigating Controls

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-269 CWE-732

Policy addresses roles, responsibilities, and privilege management to prevent improper privilege assignments.

addresses: CWE-269 CWE-732

Implements core proper privilege management by restricting to only required rights.

addresses: CWE-269 CWE-732

Policy requires training on privilege management and least privilege, making it harder to exploit improper privilege management weaknesses.

addresses: CWE-269 CWE-732

Training covers proper privilege management practices, making incorrect privilege assignments less likely.

addresses: CWE-269 CWE-732

The control mandates review of privilege assignments to ensure they are appropriate and minimal.

addresses: CWE-269 CWE-732

Baseline configuration documents and controls privilege assignments, making improper privilege management harder to introduce or sustain.

addresses: CWE-269 CWE-732

Manages privileges for change control activities and provides oversight to prevent improper privilege use in configuration updates.

addresses: CWE-269 CWE-732

Reviewing changes for security impacts prevents introduction of improper privilege assignments or escalations.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

A.5.1 only requires the existence of an overarching policy and topic-specific policies (including on access control); it does not itself enforce, implement, or act on permissions and therefore cannot stop CWE-732 from being exploitable.

blocks

A.5.12 only defines and communicates a classification scheme (with owners accountable for applying it); it does not itself enforce, restrict or decide any permissions, so the CWE-732 permission flaw can still be present and exploitable.

blocks

A.5.15 directly mandates determining access requirements, defining/enforcing topic-specific access control policy, assigning rights/restrictions by entity/role, consistency with classification, need-to-know, privileged access restrictions, segregation, formal authorization, and dynamic rules — which stops most improper privilege management from being exploitable; bounded remainder is flawed implementation of those rules (e.g. incorrect mapping or enforcement bugs).

blocks

A.5.18 directly governs the provisioning, review, modification and timely revocation of access rights (including for role changes, termination and privilege levels), which stops most improper privilege spheres from being exploitable even if the assignment flaw exists; the bounded remainder is flaws in the underlying enforcement mechanism itself (e.g. AC-3/A.8.3)

blocks

Defining and communicating authorization levels for each role limits the assignment of excessive or unnecessary privileges.

finds

Monitoring supplier policy changes and conducting audits can reveal incorrect permission assignments on resources managed by the supplier, prompting corrective action before they are exploited.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

References