Cyber Resilience

CVE-2021-27102

Command Injection in Accellion Fta ≤ 9_12_411

CISA KEVActive ExploitationEUVD ExploitedRansomware-linkedCommand Injection
Published
16 February 2021
Modified
03 November 2025
KEV Added
03 November 2021
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.036 88th percentile
Risk Priority 83 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2021-27102 is a high-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Accellion Fta. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 12% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

Accellion FTA versions 9_12_411 and earlier contain an OS command injection vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2021-27102 and assigned CWE-78. The flaw allows improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command and is exposed through a local web service call. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 7.8 with an attack vector of local, low complexity, and low privileges required.

A local attacker who can reach the affected web service can supply crafted input that results in arbitrary operating-system command execution. Successful exploitation grants the attacker full control over confidentiality, integrity, and availability on the host, consistent with the high impact ratings in the vector string.

The vendor states that the issue is resolved in FTA 9_12_416 and later releases. Accellion’s product page and the accompanying CVE disclosure file provide the fixed build information, while CISA lists the vulnerability in its catalog of known exploited vulnerabilities, confirming observed in-the-wild use.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

A05:2025 Injection

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Accellion FTA 9_12_411 and earlier is affected by OS command execution via a local web service call. The fixed version is FTA_9_12_416 and later.

CWE(s)
CWE-78
KEV Date Added
03 November 2021

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
attack.mitre.org →
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
attack.mitre.org →
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
attack.mitre.org →
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
attack.mitre.org →
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2021-27104Same product: Accellion Ftaboth on KEV
CVE-2021-27103Same product: Accellion Ftaboth on KEV
CVE-2021-27101Same product: Accellion Ftaboth on KEV
CVE-2026-28269Same product class: managed file transfer
CVE-2025-13444Same product class: managed file transfer
CVE-2026-59688Same product class: managed file transfer
CVE-2025-13447Same product class: managed file transfer
CVE-2026-59687Same product class: managed file transfer
CVE-2015-2857Same product class: managed file transfer
CVE-2026-59686Same product class: managed file transfer

Affected Assets

accellion
fta
≤ 9_12_411

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V15.2.5

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

SC-27 Platform-independent Applications
addresses: CWE-78

Platform-independent apps typically execute inside a managed runtime or sandbox that restricts direct OS command execution, reducing the ability to exploit OS command injection.

SI-10 Information Input Validation
addresses: CWE-78

Validates inputs to block special elements that would alter OS command execution.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.

References