Cyber Resilience

CVE-2022-1292

Command Injection in Openssl 1.0.2 – 1.0.2ze

Published
03 May 2022
Modified
13 August 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.83 99.6th percentile
Risk Priority 79 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2022-1292 is a high-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Openssl Openssl. Its CVSS base score is 7.3 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 0.4% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

The vulnerability is a command injection flaw (CWE-78) in the c_rehash script distributed with OpenSSL, which fails to sanitize shell metacharacters. It affects OpenSSL 3.0.0-3.0.2, 1.1.1-1.1.1n, and 1.0.2-1.0.2zd on operating systems that automatically execute the script; the issue is rated 7.3 under CVSS 3.1 with local attack vector.

An attacker able to influence files processed by c_rehash on such systems can execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script, which is considered obsolete.

Official patches have been released in OpenSSL 3.0.3, 1.1.1o, and 1.0.2ze, and vendors including Siemens and Debian advise migrating to the supported "openssl rehash" command-line tool instead of relying on the script. The EPSS score reached a peak of 0.4121 with a current value of 0.3889.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with…

more

the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd).

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2022-2068Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2020-26217Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2019-5736Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2023-47567Same product class: NAS / storage appliance
CVE-2025-66279Same product class: NAS / storage appliance
CVE-2024-21898Same product class: NAS / storage appliance
CVE-2024-48863Same product class: NAS / storage appliance
CVE-2024-21906Same product class: NAS / storage appliance
CVE-2024-14026Same product class: NAS / storage appliance
CVE-2023-39300Same product class: NAS / storage appliance

Affected Assets

siemens
brownfield connectivity gateway
≤ 2.15
openssl
openssl
1.0.2 — 1.0.2ze · 1.1.1 — 1.1.1o · 3.0.0 — 3.0.3
debian
debian linux
10.0, 11.0, 9.0
netapp
active iq unified manager
all versions
netapp
clustered data ontap
all versions
netapp
clustered data ontap antivirus connector
all versions
netapp
oncommand insight
all versions
netapp
oncommand workflow automation
all versions
netapp
santricity smi-s provider
all versions
netapp
smi-s provider
all versions
+25 more product configuration(s) — see NVD for full list

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V15.2.5

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-78

Platform-independent apps typically execute inside a managed runtime or sandbox that restricts direct OS command execution, reducing the ability to exploit OS command injection.

addresses: CWE-78

Validates inputs to block special elements that would alter OS command execution.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.

References