Cyber Resilience

CVE-2022-1292

Command Injection in Openssl 1.0.2 – 1.0.2ze

Published
03 May 2022
Modified
13 August 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.83 99.6th percentile
Risk Priority 80 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2022-1292 is a high-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Openssl Openssl. Its CVSS base score is 7.3 (High).

Operationally, ranked in the top 0.4% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) and SI-2 (Flaw Remediation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

The vulnerability is a command injection flaw (CWE-78) in the c_rehash script distributed with OpenSSL, which fails to sanitize shell metacharacters. It affects OpenSSL 3.0.0-3.0.2, 1.1.1-1.1.1n, and 1.0.2-1.0.2zd on operating systems that automatically execute the script; the issue is rated 7.3 under CVSS 3.1 with local attack vector.

An attacker able to influence files processed by c_rehash on such systems can execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script, which is considered obsolete.

Official patches have been released in OpenSSL 3.0.3, 1.1.1o, and 1.0.2ze, and vendors including Siemens and Debian advise migrating to the supported "openssl rehash" command-line tool instead of relying on the script. The EPSS score reached a peak of 0.4121 with a current value of 0.3889.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with…

more

the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd).

CWE(s)

Related Threats

Likely ATT&CK TechniquesAI

Techniques this vulnerability likely enables, inferred from its description, weakness type, and attributed-actor tradecraft. Confidence is per-technique.

T1059.004 Unix Shell Executionconfidence: HIGH
The command injection flaw in c_rehash allows arbitrary shell command execution via unsanitized input.
T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalationconfidence: HIGH
Successful exploitation grants arbitrary command execution with the privileges of the c_rehash script, enabling privilege escalation.
inferred from description + CWE · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2022-2068Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2020-26217Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2021-25216Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2024-21096Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2021-22901Same product: Netapp Active Iq Unified Manager
CVE-2019-5736Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2021-21345Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2021-3711Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2023-5363Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2020-11023Same product: Debian Debian Linux

Affected Assets

siemens
brownfield connectivity gateway
≤ 2.15
openssl
openssl
1.0.2 — 1.0.2ze · 1.1.1 — 1.1.1o · 3.0.0 — 3.0.3
debian
debian linux
10.0, 11.0, 9.0
netapp
active iq unified manager
all versions
netapp
clustered data ontap
all versions
netapp
clustered data ontap antivirus connector
all versions
netapp
oncommand insight
all versions
netapp
oncommand workflow automation
all versions
netapp
santricity smi-s provider
all versions
netapp
smi-s provider
all versions
+25 more product configuration(s) — see NVD for full list

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SI-10 Information Input Validation
  • SI-2 Flaw Remediation
  • CM-7 Least Functionality
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V15.2.5

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly requires validation and sanitization of untrusted input (filenames) processed by c_rehash, blocking the shell metacharacter injection.

prevent

Mandates timely application of the vendor patches (OpenSSL 3.0.3/1.1.1o/1.0.2ze) that eliminate the flawed c_rehash script.

prevent

Enforces least functionality by disabling or replacing the obsolete c_rehash script with the supported 'openssl rehash' tool.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.

References