Security Resilience

CVE-2022-24086

Adobe Commerce ≤ 2.3.0

CISA KEVActive ExploitationEUVD Exploited
Published
16 February 2022
Modified
23 October 2025
KEV Added
15 February 2022
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.99 99.9th percentile
Risk Priority 97 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2022-24086 is a critical-severity Improper Input Validation (CWE-20) vulnerability in Adobe Commerce. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, ranked in the top 0.1% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.3-p1 and earlier along with 2.3.7-p2 and earlier contain an improper input validation flaw (CWE-20) in the checkout process. The issue carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.8 and stems from insufficient validation of untrusted data supplied during order processing.

An unauthenticated attacker can send specially crafted input over the network to trigger arbitrary code execution on the affected server without any user interaction. Successful exploitation grants the attacker full control over the application and underlying system.

Adobe’s security bulletin APSB22-12 details the affected releases and directs customers to apply the supplied patches. The vulnerability is also catalogued in CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list, confirming observed in-the-wild use.

The associated EPSS score has remained consistently high, reaching a peak of 0.9385, indicating sustained exploitation interest since disclosure.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.3-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.7-p2 (and earlier) are affected by an improper input validation vulnerability during the checkout process. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction and could result in arbitrary code execution.

CWE(s)
KEV Date Added
15 February 2022

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-54236Same product: Adobe Commerceboth on KEV
CVE-2023-29293Same product: Adobe Commerce
CVE-2024-20758Same product: Adobe Commerce
CVE-2023-26367Same product: Adobe Commerce
CVE-2024-34109Same product: Adobe Commerce
CVE-2025-49554Same product: Adobe Commerce
CVE-2026-34685Same product: Adobe Commerce
CVE-2024-45117Same product: Adobe Commerce
CVE-2026-21282Same product: Adobe Commerce
CVE-2026-21310Same product: Adobe Commerce

Affected Assets

adobe
commerce
2.3.7, 2.4.3 · ≤ 2.3.0 · 2.3.3 — 2.3.6 · 2.4.0 — 2.4.2
adobe
magento
2.3.7, 2.4.3 · ≤ 2.3.0 · 2.3.3 — 2.3.6 · 2.4.0 — 2.4.2

Mitigating Controls

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-20

Security testing and developer training directly verify and enforce proper input validation, reducing exploitability of injection and malformed-data weaknesses.

addresses: CWE-20

Security testing and evaluation at multiple SDLC stages directly detects missing or flawed input validation, with the required remediation process ensuring fixes are applied.

addresses: CWE-20

Directly implements checks on information inputs to reject invalid data before processing.

addresses: CWE-20

Spam protection mechanisms perform filtering and detection on inbound/outbound messages, directly compensating for missing or weak input validation of unsolicited content.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

A.8.25 mandates security requirements, secure coding guidelines, checkpoints, testing (incl. code scans) and developer training in the SDLC, which reaches a slice of input validation defects but leaves the majority (incomplete enforcement, second-order inputs, parser differentials, post-validation canonicalization) unaddressed as in the SA-3 and A.8.28 anchors.

blocks

Mandating input controls that include integrity checks and input validation ensures that untrusted data is examined before use, blocking the root cause of many injection and malformed-data weaknesses.

blocks

Security-by-design principles explicitly call for data validation and sanitization at every layer, reducing the chance that malformed or malicious input will be processed without scrutiny.

prevents

Requiring language-specific secure coding standards, peer review, SAST and documented mitigation of common programming errors forces validation of all inputs before they are trusted.

finds

Testing against a defined set of requirements and using code review plus vulnerability scanning forces validation of inputs and handling of unanticipated conditions, reducing the chance that malformed data will be accepted.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-20, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References