CVE-2022-3590
Published: 14 December 2022
Summary
CVE-2022-3590 is a medium-severity Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition (CWE-367) vulnerability in Wordpress Wordpress. Its CVSS base score is 5.9 (Medium).
Operationally, ranked in the top 0.4% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis
WordPress contains an unauthenticated blind server-side request forgery vulnerability in its pingback feature. The flaw stems from a time-of-check to time-of-use race condition that occurs between the code validating outbound requests and the actual HTTP request itself, allowing an attacker to reach internal hosts that the application is explicitly configured to block. The affected component is the core WordPress pingback implementation, rated at CVSS 5.9 with network attack vector, high complexity, and no required privileges or user interaction.
An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the race condition to perform blind SSRF against internal systems, resulting in high confidentiality impact while integrity and availability remain unaffected. The attack requires the target WordPress site to have pingbacks enabled and depends on winning the TOCTOU window, which limits reliability but removes the need for authentication or special positioning.
Public analysis published by SonarSource and tracked by WPScan describes the bypass technique in detail. The EPSS score currently stands at 0.9031 with a recorded peak of 0.9158, indicating sustained exploitation interest after disclosure.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2022-42954
Vulnerability details
WordPress is affected by an unauthenticated blind SSRF in the pingback feature. Because of a TOCTOU race condition between the validation checks and the HTTP request, attackers can reach internal hosts that are explicitly forbidden.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
No named actor attribution yet. ATT&CK technique mapping in progress for this CVE.
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Timestamps meeting UTC or offset standards help identify TOCTOU issues through precise chronological reconstruction of check/use operations.