Security Resilience

CVE-2023-0611

RCE in Trendnet Tew-652Brp Firmware 3.04b01

Published
01 February 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
CVSS Score v3.1 8.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.039 90th percentile
Risk Priority 69 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-0611 is a high-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Trendnet Tew-652Brp Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).

Operationally, ranked in the top 10% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in TRENDnet TEW-652BRP 3.04B01. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file get_set.ccp of the component Web Management Interface. The manipulation leads to command injection. The attack may be…

more

initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-219935.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-0640Same product: Trendnet Tew-652Brp
CVE-2023-0639Same product: Trendnet Tew-652Brp
CVE-2023-0618Same product: Trendnet Tew-652Brp
CVE-2024-0919Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2023-51835Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2024-37642Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2023-49237Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2024-57590Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2024-0920Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2024-22545Same vendor: Trendnet

Affected Assets

trendnet
tew-652brp firmware
3.04b01

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

A.8.25 mandates secure SDLC practices including secure coding guidelines, security requirements, checkpoints, testing (scans/penetration), and developer training that reduce command injection defects, but leaves a minority slice (e.g. incomplete implementation of those practices, outsourced development without full assurance, or post-SDLC changes) where the weakness can still arise and be exploitable.

blocks

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.

blocks

A.8.27 mandates security-by-design principles (e.g. distrust external input, secure session control, data validation/sanitization, least privilege) and design reviews that can stop command injection from being introduced, but this is only a minority slice of CWE-77 because the weakness can still arise in code that bypasses those principles, in non-reviewed components, or in runtime injection vectors the architecture review does not reach.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

finds

Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-77, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References