Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-37642

RCE in Trendnet Tew-814Dap Firmware 1.01b01

Published
14 June 2024
Modified
27 May 2025
CVSS Score v3.1 9.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.11 96th percentile
Risk Priority 80 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-37642 is a critical-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Trendnet Tew-814Dap Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 9.1 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 4% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

TRENDnet TEW-814DAP version 1 running firmware FW1.01B01 contains a command injection vulnerability in the system check functionality. The flaw, tracked as CVE-2024-37642 and assigned CWE-77, allows unsanitized input passed through the ipv4_ping and ipv6_ping parameters to the /formSystemCheck endpoint to be executed by the device. It received a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.1 reflecting network attack vector, low complexity, and no required authentication or user interaction.

An unauthenticated attacker with network access can supply crafted values to these parameters and achieve arbitrary command execution on the access point. Successful exploitation grants the ability to read or modify sensitive data and alter device behavior while availability impact remains limited according to the provided scoring.

The two referenced GitHub reports document the discovery but contain no vendor advisory, firmware update, or mitigation guidance. The associated EPSS score has remained steady at 0.2175 with no material increase observed since publication.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

TRENDnet TEW-814DAP v1_(FW1.01B01) was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the ipv4_ping, ipv6_ping parameter at /formSystemCheck .

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.008 Network Device CLI Execution
Adversaries may abuse scripting or built-in command line interpreters (CLI) on network devices to execute malicious command and payloads.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-37645Same product: Trendnet Tew-814Dap
CVE-2024-37643Same product: Trendnet Tew-814Dap
CVE-2024-37641Same product: Trendnet Tew-814Dap
CVE-2023-0640Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2024-22545Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2023-0638Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2024-57590Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2023-51835Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2024-22546Same vendor: Trendnet
CVE-2024-28353Same vendor: Trendnet

Affected Assets

trendnet
tew-814dap firmware
1.01b01

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.3
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V1.2.9

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.

Input validation directly stops construction of commands from untrusted data containing special elements.

Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and neutralization that prevent command injection.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

finds

Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent command injection.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.

prevents

Secure architecture principles reduce the attack surface but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques needed.

none

Environment separation limits the blast radius of an exploited command injection but does not prevent the flaw itself.

References