Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2023-1329 is a critical-severity Classic Buffer Overflow (CWE-120) vulnerability in Hp Laserjet Managed Mfp E62665 3Gy14A Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 29% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
Certain HP multifunction printers running HP Workpath solutions are affected by a buffer overflow vulnerability that can result in remote code execution. Tracked as CVE-2023-1329 with a CVSS v3.1 score of 9.8, the flaw is associated with CWE-120 and permits an attacker to supply crafted input that overflows a buffer during solution execution on the device.
An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the issue over the network with no user interaction required, achieving arbitrary code execution that fully compromises the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the printer.
HP has published security bulletin HPSBPI03849 that identifies affected models and provides remediation guidance for customers running Workpath solutions on those products. The EPSS score has remained flat at 0.0798 since disclosure, indicating no material increase in observed exploitation interest.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-23587
Vulnerability Data
A potential security vulnerability has been identified for certain HP multifunction printers (MFPs). The vulnerability may lead to Buffer Overflow and/or Remote Code Execution when running HP Workpath solutions on potentially affected products.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V5.2.1
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Platform-independent managed code eliminates the need for unchecked native buffer copies that are the root cause of classic buffer overflows.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure development practices directly enforce bounds checking and input validation that prevent classic buffer overflows.
Vulnerability identification processes such as code review or scanning detect classic buffer overflows before exploitation.
Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing unchecked buffer copies with corrected versions.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect buffer overflows through fuzzing and static analysis, though it does not prevent them at the source.
Secure development life cycle mandates processes that can include input validation and bounds checking to prevent buffer overflows.
Application security requirements can specify input-size validation and safe buffer handling to mitigate classic buffer overflows.
Secure system architecture and engineering principles promote defensive coding patterns that reduce the likelihood of unchecked buffer copies.