Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-24261

RCE in Gl-Inet Gl-E750 Firmware ≤ 3.216

Published
21 June 2023
Modified
06 December 2024
CVSS Score v3.1 7.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.19 97th percentile
Risk Priority 65 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-24261 is a high-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Gl-Inet Gl-E750 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.2 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 3% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

A vulnerability tracked as CVE-2023-24261 affects the GL.iNET GL-E750 Mudi router in firmware versions prior to v3.216. The flaw, classified under CWE-78, permits command injection and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.2. It is triggered when an authenticated user submits a specially crafted POST request to the device.

An attacker who already possesses administrative credentials can send the malicious request over the network to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. Successful exploitation grants full control over the device, allowing the attacker to read or modify data, alter device behavior, and disrupt availability.

The affected firmware versions are those earlier than v3.216; the vendor indicates that updating to v3.216 resolves the issue. Public references consist of technical write-ups that detail the request format used to trigger the injection. The associated EPSS score has remained flat at 0.0664 with no material increase since disclosure.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability in GL.iNET GL-E750 Mudi before firmware v3.216 allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted POST request.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-29778Same vendor: Gl-Inet
CVE-2024-39228Same vendor: Gl-Inet
CVE-2023-46454Same vendor: Gl-Inet
CVE-2023-50445Same vendor: Gl-Inet
CVE-2023-31473Same product: Gl-Inet Gl-E750
CVE-2024-0292Shared CWE-78
CVE-2023-40479Shared CWE-78
CVE-2025-33206Shared CWE-78
CVE-2026-32608Shared CWE-78
CVE-2024-9916Shared CWE-78

Affected Assets

gl-inet
gl-e750 firmware
≤ 3.216

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V15.2.5

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-78

Platform-independent apps typically execute inside a managed runtime or sandbox that restricts direct OS command execution, reducing the ability to exploit OS command injection.

addresses: CWE-78

Validates inputs to block special elements that would alter OS command execution.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.

References