Security Resilience

CVE-2023-26429

Command Injection in Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend ≤ 7.10.6

Published
20 June 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
CVSS Score v3.1 3.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0079 55th percentile
Risk Priority 32 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-26429 is a low-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend. Its CVSS base score is 3.5 (Low).

Operationally, ranked in the top 45% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Control characters were not removed when exporting user feedback content. This allowed attackers to include unexpected content via user feedback and potentially break the exported data structure. We now drop all control characters that are not whitespace character during the…

more

export. No publicly available exploits are known.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-26430Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend
CVE-2023-26431Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend
CVE-2023-26435Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend
CVE-2023-26438Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend
CVE-2023-26443Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend
CVE-2023-26434Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend
CVE-2023-26451Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend
CVE-2023-26432Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend
CVE-2023-26427Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend
CVE-2023-26436Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend

Affected Assets

open-xchange
open-xchange appsuite backend
7.10.6 · ≤ 7.10.6 · 8.0.0 — 8.11.0

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

A.8.25 mandates secure SDLC practices including secure coding guidelines, security requirements, checkpoints, testing (scans/penetration), and developer training that reduce command injection defects, but leaves a minority slice (e.g. incomplete implementation of those practices, outsourced development without full assurance, or post-SDLC changes) where the weakness can still arise and be exploitable.

blocks

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.

blocks

A.8.27 mandates security-by-design principles (e.g. distrust external input, secure session control, data validation/sanitization, least privilege) and design reviews that can stop command injection from being introduced, but this is only a minority slice of CWE-77 because the weakness can still arise in code that bypasses those principles, in non-reviewed components, or in runtime injection vectors the architecture review does not reach.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

finds

Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-77, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References