Security Resilience

CVE-2023-26427

LPE in Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend ≤ 7.10.6

Public PoCLPE
Published
20 June 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
CVSS Score v3.1 3.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0033 24th percentile
Risk Priority 25 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-26427 is a low-severity Insecure Storage of Sensitive Information (CWE-922) vulnerability in Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend. Its CVSS base score is 3.2 (Low).

Operationally, ranked at the 24th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Default permissions for a properties file were too permissive. Local system users could read potentially sensitive information. We updated the default permissions for noreply.properties set during package installation. No publicly available exploits are known.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-26434Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend
CVE-2023-26431Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend
CVE-2023-26430Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend
CVE-2023-26451Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend
CVE-2023-26435Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend
CVE-2023-26429Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend
CVE-2023-26436Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend
CVE-2023-26432Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend
CVE-2023-26433Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend
CVE-2023-26438Same product: Open-Xchange Open-Xchange Appsuite Backend

Affected Assets

open-xchange
open-xchange appsuite backend
7.10.6 · ≤ 7.10.6

Mitigating Controls

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-732 CWE-922

Documenting users and component locations facilitates correct permission assignments for critical resources.

addresses: CWE-732 CWE-922

Requiring equivalent controls prevents incorrect permission assignments on critical backup resources at the alternate site.

addresses: CWE-732 CWE-922

Protecting backup availability and integrity requires correct permission assignments on critical backup resources.

addresses: CWE-732 CWE-922

Security category directly informs the required permission settings for critical resources before authorization occurs.

addresses: CWE-732

Procedures support proper permission assignment for critical resources through documented controls.

addresses: CWE-732

Attribute management for resources provides a mechanism to assign and maintain correct permissions based on security labels.

addresses: CWE-732

Prevents overly permissive assignments to critical resources by limiting to task needs.

addresses: CWE-732

Training policy covers correct permission assignment, reducing the ability to exploit incorrect permission assignments for critical resources.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

A.5.1 only requires the existence of an overarching policy and topic-specific policies (including on access control); it does not itself enforce, implement, or act on permissions and therefore cannot stop CWE-732 from being exploitable.

blocks

A.5.12 only defines and communicates a classification scheme (with owners accountable for applying it); it does not itself enforce, restrict or decide any permissions, so the CWE-732 permission flaw can still be present and exploitable.

blocks

A.5.15 directly requires determining access needs, defining and communicating an access control policy, implementing rules that map rights/restrictions to entities (including consistency with classification), and considering need-to-know, privileged restrictions, segregation, formal authorization, and dynamic factors — which squarely stops most incorrect permission assignments from being exploitable; the bounded remainder is misconfigurations that violate the policy itself.

blocks

A.5.18 directly governs the provisioning, review, adjustment and revocation of logical access rights (including for critical resources) according to business needs, policy, SoD and risk, which stops most unintended actors from reading/modifying via incorrect permissions; the bounded remainder is incorrect permission assignments that are not access-right decisions at all (e.g. filesystem umask, ACL syntax errors).

blocks

Documented responsibility for protecting assets encourages correct permission settings rather than leaving them at insecure defaults.

finds

Monitoring supplier policy changes and conducting audits can reveal incorrect permission assignments on resources managed by the supplier, prompting corrective action before they are exploited.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-922, a class-level weakness. Rules are authored against its narrower children: CWE-312.
  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-732, a class-level weakness. Rules are authored against its narrower children: CWE-276, CWE-277, CWE-281.

References