Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-31128

RCE in Nextcloud Cookbook 0.9.0 – 0.9.19

Published
26 May 2023
Modified
14 January 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.033 88th percentile
Risk Priority 71 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-31128 is a high-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Nextcloud Cookbook. Its CVSS base score is 8.1 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 12% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

NextCloud Cookbook, a recipe management application for NextCloud, contains a command-injection vulnerability in its GitHub Actions workflow file pull-checks.yml. The workflow directly interpolates the attacker-controlled github.head_ref value into a shell command without sanitization, enabling CWE-78 injection when a pull request is processed. The flaw existed prior to commits a46d9855 (master) and 489bb744 (main-0.9.x) and affected only the repository’s CI infrastructure, not deployed instances of the app.

An attacker who can open a pull request against a vulnerable fork or the upstream repository can supply a head_ref containing shell metacharacters (for example, zzz";echo${IFS}"hello";#). Because the workflow’s permissions were not restricted, successful injection grants the ability to execute arbitrary commands in the runner context, potentially leading to repository write access, secret exfiltration, or further lateral movement within the GitHub Actions environment.

The project’s security advisory GHSA-c5pc-mf2f-xq8h and the linked commits document the remediation, which replaces the untrusted input with a safe reference. The accompanying GitHub Security Lab reference on untrusted workflow inputs provides the general hardening guidance applied in the fix. The associated EPSS score reached a peak of 0.1532, indicating measurable post-disclosure exploitation interest.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

NextCloud Cookbook is a recipe library app. Prior to commit a46d9855 on the `master` branch and commit 489bb744 on the `main-0.9.x` branch, the `pull-checks.yml` workflow is vulnerable to command injection attacks because of using an untrusted `github.head_ref` field. The `github.head_ref`…

more

value is an attacker-controlled value. Assigning the value to `zzz";echo${IFS}"hello";#` can lead to command injection. Since the permission is not restricted, the attacker has a write-access to the repository. This issue is fixed in commit a46d9855 on the `master` branch and commit 489bb744 on the `main-0.9.x` branch. There is no risk for the user of the app within the NextCloud server. This only affects the main repository and possible forks of it. Those who have forked the NextCloud Cookbook repository should make sure their forks are on the latest version to prevent code injection attacks and similar.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-30247Same vendor: Nextcloud
CVE-2023-26482Same vendor: Nextcloud
CVE-2025-8628Shared CWE-78
CVE-2024-22836Shared CWE-78
CVE-2023-25826Shared CWE-78
CVE-2026-65590Shared CWE-78
CVE-2026-72880Shared CWE-78
CVE-2024-28125Shared CWE-78
CVE-2026-9207Shared CWE-78
CVE-2026-33145Shared CWE-78

Affected Assets

nextcloud
cookbook
0.9.0 — 0.9.19

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V15.2.5

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-78

Platform-independent apps typically execute inside a managed runtime or sandbox that restricts direct OS command execution, reducing the ability to exploit OS command injection.

addresses: CWE-78

Validates inputs to block special elements that would alter OS command execution.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.

References